Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/emissium/cursor-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/emissium/cursor-rules/git_workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/emissium/cursor-rules/git_workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/emissium/cursor-rules/git_workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/emissium/cursor-rules/git_workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/emissium/cursor-rules/git_workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00906 | $0.00906 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00362 | $0.00362 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00181 | $0.00181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00091 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
git_workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Purpose
Standardize how we create and synchronize GitHub issues with Knowledge Graph Task:* entities. Prevent duplicates, ensure reliable shell behavior, and maintain a single canonical link per task.
Prerequisites
- Authenticated GitHub CLI:
gh auth status - Derive repo slug dynamically (never hardcode):
gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner
- If no default repo is set and a command errors, set it:
gh repo set-default <owner/repo>
Canonical Workflow
-
Discover repository slug
SLUG=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner)
-
De-dup BEFORE creating issues
- Search by normalized title/label. If a matching issue exists, DO NOT create a new one; log the URL and continue.
- Examples:
gh issue list --repo "$SLUG" --search 'in:title "<normalized-title>"' --json number,title,url
-
Create issues using here-doc files (-F)
- Always write the body to a file and use
-Fto avoid quoting problems. - Example:
cat > /tmp/issue.md <<'EOF' Context: <why> Acceptance criteria: - item 1 - item 2 EOF gh issue create --repo "$SLUG" -t "P0: <Title> — <short>" -F /tmp/issue.md -l enhancement
- Always write the body to a file and use
-
Knowledge Graph sync (exactly one link)
- For each
Task:*, write back a single observation:GitHub: <url> - If a link already exists, UPDATE/REPLACE it; do not append a second link.
- Link
Task:*toRepo:*via relationtracks. - Ensure that KG & GH are updated IMMEDIATELY AFTER EVERY TASK COMPLETION, consider this step the last step of every task given.
- For each
-
On mistakes (duplicates)
- Close duplicates rather than deleting the issue.
- Re-sync KG: remove stale GitHub link observations so only the canonical link remains.
Mapping & Naming
- Maintain stable ordering: map core tasks to issues
#1–#N. Add new tasks incrementally (e.g., new P0 becomes next number). - Titles:
P{0|1|2}: <TaskName> — <short description> - Labels:
bugfor defects;enhancementfor task/feature work.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 92 lines · 906 tokens per session scan A 5c2c6e8fd4b6
git_workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository emissium/cursor-rules (7 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 906 tokens to every session, about $0.0036 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
changesets
Changeset format and bump rules enforced by CI.
project-context
Current repository context, commands, and documentation authority.
iris
GitHub operations specialist — branches, pull requests, issues, releases, tags. Called by zeus after review. Never pushes or merges without explicit human approval. Integrates with VS Code GitHub Pull Requests extension.
github-repo-triage
Triage and maintain GitHub repos — issues, PRs, cherry-picks, releases, publishing.
git_rules
When asked to interact with git, github or project management tooling (jira, linear, asana etc).
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.