Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/encoreshao/encore-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/encoreshao/encore-skills/eng-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/encoreshao/encore-skills/eng-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/encoreshao/encore-skills/eng-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/encoreshao/encore-skills/eng-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/encoreshao/encore-skills/eng-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00072 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00029 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00014 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00007 |
Grade A, and why
eng-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
@skills/eng-workflow/SKILL.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 8 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A d873cf0d8b75
eng-workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository encoreshao/encore-skills (2 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 72 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
eng-workflow compared with cursor rules from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| eng-workflowencoreshao/encore-skills | Cursor rule | 2 | 10d ago | MIT | A | 48 | Cursor |
| roslyn-mcp-version-bumpVuDZ/RoslynMcpServer | Cursor rule | 8 | yesterday | MIT | A | 524 | Cursor |
| changeseteyaltoledano/claude-task-master | Cursor rule | 28k | 6mo ago | none | A | 1,497 | Cursor |
| no-tool-contributorsreddy-sh/tokenHUD | Cursor rule | 2 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 104 | Cursor |
| github-repo-triagecdbattags/ai | Cursor rule | 5 | 8mo ago | MIT | A | 459 | Cursor |
| gitduongductrong/cursor-kit | Cursor rule | 23 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 285 | Cursor |
| git-workflownedcodes-ok/cursor-doctor | Cursor rule | 10 | 8mo ago | MIT | A | 891 | Cursor |