Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/encoreshao/encore-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/encoreshao/encore-skills/review-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/encoreshao/encore-skills/review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/encoreshao/encore-skills/review-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/encoreshao/encore-skills/review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/encoreshao/encore-skills/review-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00047 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00019 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00009 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00005 |
Grade A, and why
review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
@skills/review-code/SKILL.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 8 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A cda072e60e04
review-code is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository encoreshao/encore-skills (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 47 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ui-components
USE WHEN: Building UI components, structuring layouts, and applying styles using Tailwind CSS.
api-design-typescript
API Design for TypeScript — Express, NestJS, Fastify patterns, middleware, validation, and error handling. Extends core/rules/api-design.mdc with TypeScript-specific guidance.
api-design
API design guidelines — REST principles, GraphQL patterns, versioning, pagination, error handling, documentation, security, caching, and testing. Applied when designing or reviewing API endpoints.
owasp-ai-security-privacy
OWASP AI Security & Privacy Guide – PR rules emphasizing data protection, governance, and safety.
website-shower
Read-only Website Shower cleanup audit.
ai-dev-os-review
Performs a comprehensive self-review before creating a PR. Combines guideline compliance checking (L3) with design-level review (L2) and philosophical alignment (L1). Unlike @ai-dev-os-check which only checks rules, this also evaluates architecture decisions and code design quality.