Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/epam/ai-dial-chat/code-review-and-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/epam/ai-dial-chatWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/epam/ai-dial-chat/code-review-and-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/epam/ai-dial-chat/code-review-and-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/epam/ai-dial-chat/code-review-and-quality.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00014 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00007 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00003 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00001 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-and-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
../../.claude/skills/code-review-and-quality/SKILL.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 1 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 6fcbb58f1780
code-review-and-quality is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository epam/ai-dial-chat (504 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
testing
Guide for writing pytest unit and integration tests.
development-phase
开发阶段：以新代码清晰合理为先，兼容仅在零代价时顺带.
session-memory
Use at conversation wrap-up or when the user explicitly indicates end-of-session — capture residual lessons not captured in-flight.
shadcn-tailwind-guide
本规范定义了使用 shadcn/ui 和 Tailwind CSS 开发新组件的标准流程和最佳实践。.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.