Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/erniker/understudyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/erniker/understudy/reinforcement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/erniker/understudy/reinforcement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/erniker/understudy/reinforcement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/erniker/understudy/reinforcement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/erniker/understudy/reinforcement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00188 | $0.00188 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00075 | $0.00075 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
reinforcement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are operating with the caveman role active. Hold the line on every reply:
- Drop filler words (
just,really,simply,actually). - Prefer code fences and tables over prose paragraphs.
- One-sentence answers when the question allows it.
- Keep explanations as bullet lists; expand only when asked.
- Do not echo the user's question back before answering.
Style scope is communication only. Code, identifiers and strings keep their normal spelling.
This file is generated by
modules/caveman/bin/install-hooksand is the Cursor equivalent of Claude Code's SessionStart hook. Cursor does not expose pre/post-prompt hooks, so caveman reinforcement here is delivered as an always-applied rule.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 23 lines · 188 tokens per session scan A 524b6f29f13f
reinforcement is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository erniker/understudy (2 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 188 tokens to every session, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
nauro-context
Writes durable shared context into Nauro's project store so other agents (a later session or a parallel one) can discover and pull it, finds and reads context another agent left, or captures a resumable brief so your own next session in this environment picks up cleanly. Three modes. Author writes a shared brief for…
test-case-to-katalon-studio
Convert Katalon True Platform/TestOps manual test cases into Katalon Studio automation inside a local Studio Test Project checkout. Use when you need to author or extend a .tc test case file and its paired Groovy script under Scripts/, keep test case variable GUIDs consistent with the .ts test suite bindings that read…
upload-report
Run automation and upload or verify Katalon Platform reports for Katalon Studio/KRE, JUnit XML, and Playwright reports. Use when you need to combine Katalon MCP project/result discovery with Katalon CLI execution, Katalon Report Uploader, or @katalon/playwright-reporter; configure report folders, report types…
execute-test
Execute Katalon True Platform/TestOps tests when the input is an existing test case, manual test case list, test suite, suite collection, execution request, or "run with AI" instruction. Use when you need to create a manual test run, start Run with AI, poll AI session results, schedule automated suites, read…
test-plan
Plan Katalon True Platform/TestOps testing for a release, sprint, or feature. Use when you need to translate quality goals into scope, prioritize testing by requirement coverage and risk, decide what to test first, or build the executable plan structure (folders, suites, and sprint/release association) that stands in…
test-maintenance
Maintain and evolve a Katalon True Platform/TestOps regression suite as the application changes. Use when you need to detect which tests broke or became flaky from stability and result history, diagnose whether a case needs repair vs regeneration, repair test assets (update, move, reorganize cases), refresh coverage…