Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ezorita/scotpyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/ezorita/scotpy/project_structure)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ezorita/scotpy/project_structure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ezorita/scotpy/project_structure/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ezorita/scotpy/project_structure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ezorita/scotpy/project_structure.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00275 | $0.00275 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00110 | $0.00110 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00055 | $0.00055 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
project_structure scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
This is the file structure of the smart coding template:
project-name/
├── .cursor/
│ └── rules/ # AI-optimized Cursor rules
├── .github/
│ └── workflows/
│ └── ci.yml # Continuous integration pipeline
├── .vscode/ # Editor settings and extension recommendations
├── project/ # Auto-generated project documentation
│ ├── vision.md # Project vision (created during setup)
│ └── 00_feature-name/ # Feature-specific docs (created per feature)
│ ├── feature.md # Feature specification and requirements
│ ├── implementation.md # Technical implementation strategy
│ └── tasks.md # Detailed task breakdown
├── src/ # Source code
├── tests/ # Test suite
├── .pre-commit-config.yaml # Pre-commit hooks configuration
├── .secrets.baseline # Known secrets patterns for security scanning
├── CONTRIBUTING.md # Development and contribution guidelines
├── poetry.toml # Poetry-specific configuration
├── pyproject.toml # Project configuration
├── README.md # Your project README
└── DOCS.md # This document (can be deleted after cloning)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 275 tokens per session scan A 9644f4752b8c
project_structure is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository ezorita/scotpy (5 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 275 tokens to every session, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
creating-cursor-rules
Meta-rule for creating effective Cursor IDE rules with best practices, patterns, and examples.
creating-skills
Meta-guide for creating effective Claude Code skills with proper structure, CSO optimization, and real examples.
test-case-to-katalon-studio
Convert Katalon True Platform/TestOps manual test cases into Katalon Studio automation inside a local Studio Test Project checkout. Use when you need to author or extend a .tc test case file and its paired Groovy script under Scripts/, keep test case variable GUIDs consistent with the .ts test suite bindings that read…
execute-test
Execute Katalon True Platform/TestOps tests when the input is an existing test case, manual test case list, test suite, suite collection, execution request, or "run with AI" instruction. Use when you need to create a manual test run, start Run with AI, poll AI session results, schedule automated suites, read…
test-plan
Plan Katalon True Platform/TestOps testing for a release, sprint, or feature. Use when you need to translate quality goals into scope, prioritize testing by requirement coverage and risk, decide what to test first, or build the executable plan structure (folders, suites, and sprint/release association) that stands in…
test-maintenance
Maintain and evolve a Katalon True Platform/TestOps regression suite as the application changes. Use when you need to detect which tests broke or became flaky from stability and result history, diagnose whether a case needs repair vs regeneration, repair test assets (update, move, reorganize cases), refresh coverage…