Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FeatureFactory-io/mimirWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/featurefactory-io/mimir/do-informative-logging)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/featurefactory-io/mimir/do-informative-logging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/featurefactory-io/mimir/do-informative-logging/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/featurefactory-io/mimir/do-informative-logging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/featurefactory-io/mimir/do-informative-logging.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01037 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00415 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
do-informative-logging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mimir metadata (required on apply): always_apply: true (currently false). This rule absorbs and replaces add-logging.
Every service call or controller action must log to logs/app.log (or the project’s designated app log) at INFO. Configure logging if missing: logger + file handler that rotates / clears on every app relaunch so diagnosis starts clean.
Use logs/app.log to troubleshoot who was doing what with which data when error X occurred. For UI / HTMX flows use console.log for decisions, actions, and results (map to the same story beats below).
Ban deferred-logging slices. Logging ships in the same green slice as behavior — never a final “informative logging pass” after tests are green.
Ask yourself before writing each log line:
- What information will I need to precisely pinpoint where the error is occurring?
- What context will I need in the logs to understand why it happened?
- What data transformations or validations occurred?
- Which decisions led to the current point?
Story beats (minimum narrative)
On each major step emit the applicable beats so a reader can reconstruct the path:
entry → config → validation → processing → branch → exit → error
Preferred line format (grep / caplog friendly)
{logger_name} | {Class.method} | {beat} | key=value ...
Legacy Class.method: message | key=value is acceptable if where + beat intent remain searchable.
Logging setup
import logging
import io
from pprint import pformat
from tabulate import tabulate
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
buffer = io.StringIO() # structured dumps
Buffers: use StringIO; log buffer.getvalue(), then truncate(0) (and seek(0) if reusing). Summaries: include shape/types, head/tail/describe, null counts where useful.
Patterns (examples)
1. Entry
def method_name(self, param1, param2):
logger.info(
f'{self.__class__.__name__}.method_name | entry | param1={param1} param2_shape={getattr(param2, "shape", type(param2))}'
)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 124 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 65ec0116a533
do-informative-logging is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository FeatureFactory-io/mimir (16 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,037 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
error-handling-and-validation
A code-quality guide for handling errors, invalid inputs, edge cases, preconditions, logging, and user-friendly error messages.
css-render-blocking-diagnosis
Cursor rule "css-render-blocking-diagnosis" from adobecom/da-express-milo, covering css render-blocking diagnosis & resolution, critical learning from 98 pagespeed achievement, primary diagnostic protocol, step 1: css blocking symptom recognition and step 2: css loading sequence audit.
modus-checkbox-value-inversion-react-short
Critical bug fix for ModusWcCheckbox value property inversion.
javascript-expert-performance
Profile first. Measure before and after. Never optimize without data.
kiss-ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
5-bug-finder
APPLY WHEN investigating a bug.