Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/feelyourprotocol/mcp-gatewayWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/feelyourprotocol/mcp-gateway/mcp-surface)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/feelyourprotocol/mcp-gateway/mcp-surface"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/feelyourprotocol/mcp-gateway/mcp-surface/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/feelyourprotocol/mcp-gateway/mcp-surface"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/feelyourprotocol/mcp-gateway/mcp-surface.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00700 | $0.00700 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00280 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00140 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00070 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
mcp-surface scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 44 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MCP surface (gateway)
Few generic tools
- Tools are verbs (probe, simulate, transaction, block, generate, inspect), not per-EIP or per-fork endpoints. MCP names:
describe_capabilities,run_bytecode,run_transaction,run_block,generate_artifact,inspect_artifact - Do not add
simulate_eip8024orrun_amsterdam— EIP modules and named forks live in the engine catalog - New query shape → one new generic tool + engine function
Descriptions are the prompt
- Server
instructionsmust claim generic hardfork prompts (run under Glamsterdam / Fusaka / Pectra with no EIP named) - Tool
descriptionstrings must mention Glamsterdam, generic fork runs, runnable EIPs, and which verb to pick (run_bytecodevsrun_transactionvsrun_blockvsgenerate_artifactvsinspect_artifact) describe_capabilities: probe first — named forks as capabilities, runnable modules, opcodes/encoding,queryShapes+tools(notshapes), spec snapshot (specUrl,specDate,status,testReleaseName)run_bytecode: generic bytecode under a fork; opcodes / precompiles / traces / program-gas SSTORE; optional accounts prestate; point at probe; no demo programsrun_transaction: generic paid tx under a fork; receipts, wallet gasLimit, txStateGas; point at proberun_block: 1–8 txs as a lab block, optional header slot/number/timestamp; not BAL JSONgenerate_artifact: derive lab artifacts (BAL first) — same inputs as run_blockinspect_artifact: judge caller-supplied structures (BAL JSON/RLP) without chain state
Probe-first for runtime agents
- Human and runtime agents should call
describe_capabilitiesbeforerun_bytecode,run_transaction,run_block,generate_artifact, orinspect_artifact - Live
describeCapabilities()is authoritative — not stale markdown in the repo
After gateway changes
npm run buildinmcp-gatewaynpm run buildinmcp-execution-engineif engine API changed- Restart MCP server in Cursor (Settings → MCP)
- Update mcp-docs tool pages +
llms.txtwhen behavior or tool list changes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago Changed · +3 lines · +178 tokens per session b4bf264e6f1e
- 27d ago Changed · +18 tokens per session a049c61366ef
- 1mo ago Changed · +5 tokens per session f7a3179b9584
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines · +93 tokens per session c7ce401765e2
- 1mo ago Changed · +15 tokens per session 378016c699e7
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines · +38 tokens per session 80281a3e688a
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines · +44 tokens per session 059bfc9abf72
- 1mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 309 tokens per session scan A e0dafc26808c
mcp-surface is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository feelyourprotocol/mcp-gateway (0 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 700 tokens to every session, about $0.0028 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
shared-plane-packages
Pattern for creating shared plane packages that serve both migration and runtime planes.