Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fmflurry/settings-opencodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/fmflurry/settings-opencode/verification-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/fmflurry/settings-opencode/verification-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/fmflurry/settings-opencode/verification-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/fmflurry/settings-opencode/verification-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/fmflurry/settings-opencode/verification-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.01029 | $0.01029 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00412 | $0.00412 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00206 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00103 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
verification-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 49 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verification Gate (mandatory before "done")
Agents have repeatedly reported "implementation done" while the build is red. This rule fixes that. Applies to anyone who wrote or edited source code in the current turn — main agent or subagent.
Hard rule
You MAY NOT tell the user "done", "complete", "ready", "ready to merge", or render a green-status final message until you have:
- Detected the project type from manifests present in cwd (search recursively, not only at root —
.csproj,pom.xml,build.gradle*, etc. often live in subdirs):angular.json/tsconfig.json/package.json→ TS/AngularCargo.toml→ Rustgo.mod→ Gopyproject.toml(with mypy/pyright config) → Pythonpom.xml→ Java/Mavenbuild.gradle/build.gradle.kts→ Java or Kotlin/Gradle (checksettings.gradle*+ presence of*.ktvs*.javato disambiguate; Kotlin Multiplatform falls under Kotlin)*.sln/*.slnx/*.slnf/*.csproj/*.fsproj/*.vbproj/global.json/Directory.Build.props→ .NET (C#/F#/VB)..slnxis the XML-based format (default in .NET 10 SDK, supported since 9.0.200);.slnfis a solution filter referencing a.sln/.slnx
- Run the matching independent verification yourself (do not trust a subagent's self-report):
- TS/Angular:
npx tsc --noEmit --pretty false - Rust:
cargo check --message-format=short - Go:
go build ./... - Python:
mypy .orpyright - Java/Maven:
mvn -q -DskipTests compile(multi-module: run from repo root, Maven recurses) - Java/Gradle:
./gradlew --offline compileJava compileTestJava -x test(orcompileKotlinfor Kotlin) - .NET:
dotnet build --nologo -clp:ErrorsOnly --no-restore(rundotnet restorefirst ifobj/is missing); pass the explicit path for a solution:dotnet build path/to/Solution.slnordotnet build path/to/Solution.slnx(SDK 9.0.200+ required for.slnx)
- TS/Angular:
- When a
scripts.lintentry exists inpackage.json, run<pm> run lint(auto-detect package manager:bun.lock/bun.lockb→bun;pnpm-lock.yaml→pnpm;yarn.lock→yarn; elsenpm). Lint errors are blocking — treat them exactly like build errors: fix before claiming "done". - When the diff changes behavior, also run the tests covering the changed files (e.g.
dotnet test --filter <Class>,npx vitest related <files> --run,npx jest --findRelatedTests <files>) or use therunskill for UI changes; a compile proves nothing about behavior. - Paste the last ~15 lines of each command's actual output into your reply, OR explicitly state
n/a — <reason>. No paraphrasing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 49 lines · 1,029 tokens per session scan A 593ddf59c6f8
verification-gate is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository fmflurry/settings-opencode (171 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 1,029 tokens to every session, about $0.0041 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-08.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
20-testing-generated-and-structure
Testing expectations, generated-file boundaries, and CLI structure contract.
fuzzing
Fuzzing setup and guidelines for skia-rs.
testing-and-quality
The testcomprehensive.py provides systematic testing of all 31 MCP tools.
smoke-monkey-tester
Smoke tests for core functionality and monkey/chaos tests aiming to break the system with randomized inputs. / TR: Sistemin temel fonksiyonlarını kontrol eden smoke testler ve rastgele girdilerle sistemi çökertmeyi hedefleyen monkey/chaos testleri.
STAGE_S5_TEST_POINTS
A staged workflow for turning approved requirements into a complete list of test points. It checks required earlier documents and records any requirement that has no matching test point.
testing
Testing conventions for Ion Design System using Jest and Angular Testing Library.