Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-landscapegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/forger-labs-hq/researchforgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-landscape)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-landscape"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-landscape.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00489 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00244 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
researchforge-landscape scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Build the research landscape
This is a handshake: the engine exports structured context, you write the synthesis as YAML, the engine validates it field-by-field before anything is stored. Your synthesis must be grounded in the exported papers only.
1. Export context
researchforge research context --json
This writes .researchforge/synthesis/context.json: the objective, the
stored papers (id, title, abstract, ranking signals), and — critically — the
embedded JSON Schema the artifact must conform to. Read the whole file.
2. Write the landscape
Write .researchforge/synthesis/landscape.yaml conforming exactly to the
embedded schema. Requirements the validator will enforce:
- every
cited_paper_idsentry must be a stored paper id from the context; - every direction needs evidence claims that distinguish claims made by a
paper from your interpretation (
evidence_type), each with anextraction_confidence; - do not cite papers for statements their abstracts cannot support.
3. Import (engine validates)
researchforge research landscape --import .researchforge/synthesis/landscape.yaml --json
If validation fails, the --json error payload lists field-level errors
(path, message, offending value). Re-read the error payload, fix exactly
those fields in the YAML, and re-import. Never bypass validation by editing
stored files directly.
Next: the researchforge-hypotheses rule turns directions into testable hypotheses.
Rules
- The Python engine is the boundary: never work around a validation error, a protected path, or an approval gate — fix the artifact or ask the user.
- Approvals belong to the user: never pass
--yesor type a confirmation unless the user explicitly approved that step in this conversation. - Ground every summary in stored data: quote only numbers returned by
--jsonoutput or files under.researchforge/— never invent metrics.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 56 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f3279d5dc6bc
researchforge-landscape is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository forger-labs-hq/researchforge (7 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 489 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
release-notes
Generate changelog entries and GitHub releases from git history. Categorizes commits into features, fixes, breaking changes, and docs. Supports conventional commits, PR-based grouping, and semantic versioning. Creates formatted CHANGELOG.md entries and GitHub releases.
facebook-ads
Meta Ads (Facebook & Instagram) platform expertise. Audit campaigns, audiences, creative strategy, pixel tracking, and CAPI. Use when the user asks about Facebook Ads, Instagram Ads, Meta Ads, social media advertising, Advantage+ campaigns, or Meta pixel/CAPI setup.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.