core-specification

core-specification is a cursor rule for Cursor from GaetanOff/bootstrap-ia-sdd. It costs 3,190 tokens per session, scanned A, original, GPL-3.0.

A set of instructions for writing and maintaining specifications—the written description of how a system should behave—as the project's main reference.

In plain words
What is it for?
Writing new specifications, structuring them, and keeping them up to date as the project changes.
Why use it?
It keeps requirements organised and gives developers one agreed source to check when planning or changing code.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/gaetanoff/bootstrap-ia-sdd/core-specification
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GaetanOff/bootstrap-ia-sdd

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for core-specification

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/gaetanoff/bootstrap-ia-sdd/core-specification.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/gaetanoff/bootstrap-ia-sdd/core-specification)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/gaetanoff/bootstrap-ia-sdd/core-specification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/gaetanoff/bootstrap-ia-sdd/core-specification.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 3,190 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 3,190 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.03190 $0.03190
Opus 5 $0.01595 $0.01595
Sonnet 5 $0.00638 $0.00638
Haiku 4.5 $0.00319 $0.00319

Measured 4d ago against content hash c47a8c0444d4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

core-specification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/core-specification.mdc · 466 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed GPL-3.0

The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 466 lines · 3,190 tokens per session scan A c47a8c0444d4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

core-specification is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository GaetanOff/bootstrap-ia-sdd (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 3,190 tokens to every session, about $0.0159 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.