contract-review

contract-review is a cursor rule for Cursor from galyarderlabs/galyarder-framework. It costs 17 tokens per session (2,475 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A structured contract-review assistant for examining agreements and highlighting potential problems.

In plain words
What is it for?
Finding contract risks, flagging unfavorable clauses, and identifying points that may be negotiated.
Why use it?
It helps surface risky or one-sided terms that may be easy to miss during a manual review.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/.

Good fit Finding contract risks, flagging unfavorable clauses, and identifying points that may be negotiated.

Compare 6 cursor rules from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/galyarderlabs/galyarder-framework/contract-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/galyarderlabs/galyarder-framework

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for contract-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/galyarderlabs/galyarder-framework/contract-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/galyarderlabs/galyarder-framework/contract-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/galyarderlabs/galyarder-framework/contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/galyarderlabs/galyarder-framework/contract-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for contract-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/galyarderlabs/galyarder-framework/contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/galyarderlabs/galyarder-framework/contract-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 17 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,475 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00017 $0.02475
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.01238
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00495
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00248

Measured 9d ago against content hash 89144829551c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

contract-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/contract-review.mdc · 332 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 332 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

THE Agentic Company Framework GLOBAL PROTOCOLS (MANDATORY)

1. Token Economy: The RTK Prefix

The local environment is optimized with rtk (Rust Token Killer). Always use the rtk prefix for shell commands (e.g., rtk npm test) to minimize token consumption.

  • Example: rtk npm test, rtk git status, rtk ls -la.
  • Note: Never use raw bash commands unless rtk is unavailable.

2. Traceability: Linear is Law

No cognitive labor happens outside of a tracked ticket. You operate exclusively within the bounds of a project-scoped issue.

  • Project Discovery: Before any work, check if a Linear project exists for the current workspace. If not, CREATE it.
  • Issue Creation: ALWAYS create or link an issue WITHIN the specific Linear project. NEVER operate on 'No Project' issues.
  • Status: Transition issues to "In Progress" before coding and "Done" after verification.

3. Cognitive Integrity: Scratchpad Reasoning

Before executing any high-impact tool (write_file, replace, run_shell_command), it is standard protocol to output a <scratchpad> block demonstrating your internal reasoning, trade-off analysis, and specific execution plan.

4. Technical Integrity: The industry experts Principles

Combat AI slop through rigid adherence to the four principles of Andrej industry experts:

  1. Think Before Coding: Don't guess. If uncertain, STOP and ASK. State assumptions explicitly. If ambiguity exists, present multiple interpretationsdon't pick silently. Push back if a simpler approach exists.
  2. Simplicity First: Implement the minimum code that solves the problem. No speculative abstractions. If 200 lines could be 50, rewrite it. No "configurability" unless requested.
  3. Surgical Changes: Touch ONLY what is necessary. Every changed line must trace to the request. Don't "improve" adjacent code or refactor things that aren't broken. Remove orphans YOUR changes made, but leave pre-existing dead code (mention it instead).
  4. Goal-Driven Execution: Define success criteria via tests-first. Loop until verified.
    • Multi-step tasks MUST use this syntax:
      1. [Step] verify: [check]
      2. [Step] verify: [check]

Read the full file on GitHub · 332 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 332 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 89144829551c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

contract-review is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository galyarderlabs/galyarder-framework (24 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 2,475 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.