Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP-iOS-TemplateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp-ios-template/swift-ios-project)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp-ios-template/swift-ios-project"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp-ios-template/swift-ios-project/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp-ios-template/swift-ios-project"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp-ios-template/swift-ios-project.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.02702 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.01081 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00540 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00270 |
Grade A, and why
swift-ios-project scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 350 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Project-wide AI coding guidelines for Cursor (Swift iOS app)
Project Overview
This is a native iOS application built with Swift 6.1+ and SwiftUI. The codebase targets iOS 18.0 and later, allowing full use of the latest Swift and iOS APIs without backward compatibility concerns. All concurrency is handled with Swift Concurrency (async/await, actors, @MainActor isolation) ensuring thread-safe code.
- Frameworks & Tech: SwiftUI for UI, Swift Concurrency with strict mode, Swift Package Manager for modular architecture
- Architecture: Model-View (MV) pattern using pure SwiftUI state management. We avoid MVVM and instead leverage SwiftUI's built-in state mechanisms (@State, @Observable, @Environment, @Binding)
- Testing: Swift Testing framework with modern @Test macros and #expect/#require assertions
- Platform: iOS (Simulator and Device)
- Accessibility: Full accessibility support using SwiftUI's accessibility modifiers
Project Structure
The project follows a workspace + SPM package architecture:
YourApp/
├── Config/ # XCConfig build settings
│ ├── Debug.xcconfig
│ ├── Release.xcconfig
│ ├── Shared.xcconfig
│ └── Tests.xcconfig
├── YourApp.xcworkspace/ # Workspace container
├── YourApp.xcodeproj/ # App shell (minimal wrapper)
├── YourApp/ # App target - just the entry point
│ ├── Assets.xcassets/
│ ├── YourAppApp.swift # @main entry point only
│ └── YourApp.xctestplan
├── YourAppPackage/ # All features and business logic
│ ├── Package.swift
│ ├── Sources/
│ │ └── YourAppFeature/ # Feature modules
│ └── Tests/
│ └── YourAppFeatureTests/ # Swift Testing tests
└── YourAppUITests/ # UI automation tests
Important: All development work should be done in the YourAppPackage Swift Package, not in the app project. The app project is merely a thin wrapper that imports and launches the package features.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 350 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 67ce222c522b
swift-ios-project is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP-iOS-Template (42 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,702 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
swiftui-guidelines-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for SwiftUI development guidelines.
gradle
Enforce modern Gradle build practices for Java and Android projects, focusing on Kotlin DSL, modularity, version catalogs, and performance optimizations.
compose-coroutines
Compose scroll/coroutine patterns — prevent programmatic scroll from being mistaken for user scroll, cancellation-safe flag resets.
android-viewmodel
Android ViewModel conventions — StateFlow, repository abstraction, coroutines, no LiveData.
trove-swift
Swift 6 and SwiftUI coding conventions for iOS development. Auto-activates when working with Swift files. Covers @Observable, async/await, NavigationStack, Swift Testing, and accessibility.
hatch3r-android-patterns
Android Kotlin conventions covering Jetpack Compose, coroutines + Flow, Hilt DI, Room, modular Gradle, AGP 8.x, target SDK 35, and Compose testing.