Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/girijashankarj/cursor-handbook/integration-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/girijashankarj/cursor-handbookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/girijashankarj/cursor-handbook/integration-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/girijashankarj/cursor-handbook/integration-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/girijashankarj/cursor-handbook/integration-testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00446 | $0.00446 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00223 | $0.00223 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00089 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00045 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
integration-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Integration Testing Rules
Setup
- Use a dedicated test database (never production or development)
- Reset database state before each test suite
- Use transactions for test isolation when possible
- Seed minimal data required for each test
API Integration Tests
describe('POST /api/v1/orders', () => {
it('should create an order and return 201', async () => {
const payload = {
customerId: testCustomer.id,
items: [{ productId: testProduct.id, quantity: 2 }],
};
const response = await request(app)
.post('/api/v1/orders')
.set('Authorization', `Bearer ${testToken}`)
.set('X-Correlation-Id', 'test-123')
.send(payload)
.expect(201);
expect(response.body.data).toMatchObject({
customerId: testCustomer.id,
status: 'PENDING',
});
expect(response.body.meta.correlationId).toBe('test-123');
});
it('should return 400 for invalid payload', async () => {
const response = await request(app)
.post('/api/v1/orders')
.set('Authorization', `Bearer ${testToken}`)
.send({})
.expect(400);
expect(response.body.error.code).toBe('VALIDATION_ERROR');
});
it('should return 401 without auth token', async () => {
await request(app)
.post('/api/v1/orders')
.send({ customerId: 'test' })
.expect(401);
});
});
Rules
- Test the full request/response cycle — no mocking the HTTP layer
- Test all status codes: success, validation error, auth error, not found
- Test request validation (missing fields, wrong types, boundary values)
- Test pagination, sorting, and filtering
- Verify response envelope format matches API contract
- Clean up test data — don't leave artifacts
- Use a separate port for test server to avoid conflicts
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 64 lines · 446 tokens per session scan A 0b9250a9a29b
integration-testing is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository girijashankarj/cursor-handbook (30 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 446 tokens to every session, about $0.0022 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
full-stack-ship-discipline
Require frontend changes and their DB/RPC/RLS/storage/secret dependencies to ship and be remotely verified together. Apply when implementing code that reads or writes backend state. Do not apply to plan- or present-then-stop audits; production data mutation still requires confirmation.
supabase
Supabase patterns and conventions for this project.
sql
Rules for SQL files (queries, migrations, stored procs).
graphstack
GraphStack v4.7.1 — Orchestrated, graph-first, GNAP-tracked AI development (cross-platform).
testing-pyramid-agent
Provides guidance on testing pyramid principles and how to analyze test distribution. Use this rule when discussing test distribution, test strategy, or when analyzing test coverage across unit, integration, and E2E tests.
mysql-auto
This rule enforces MySQL-specific best practices to enhance readability, performance, security, and maintainability. It targets MySQL features (e.g., storage engines, character sets) and common pitfalls, and adds concrete guidance for schema design and creation.