cursor_rules_location

A rule for storing Cursor editor rule files in the project’s .cursor/rules directory, using descriptive kebab-case names and the .mdc extension. Cursor rules are written instructions that guide the editor or coding agent.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when creating or reviewing Cursor rule files and checking that their names, extensions, and directory are correct.
Why use it?
It keeps project rules in the location Cursor expects, so they can be found and applied consistently. It also prevents confusing or invalid file placement.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/gitmaxd/ai-init/cursor_rules_location
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Gitmaxd/ai-init

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 397 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 397 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00397 $0.00397
Opus 5 $0.00198 $0.00198
Sonnet 5 $0.00079 $0.00079
Haiku 4.5 $0.00040 $0.00040

Measured yesterday against content hash 751ee84769d5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cursor_rules_location scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

lib/templates/next/.cursor/rules/cursor_rules_location.mdc · 57 lines

What it actually says

  1. Always place rule files in PROJECT_ROOT/.cursor/rules/:
     .cursor/rules/
     ├── your-rule-name.mdc
     ├── another-rule.mdc
     └── ...

  2. Follow the naming convention:
     - Use kebab-case for filenames
     - Always use .mdc extension
     - Make names descriptive of the rule's purpose

  3. Directory structure:
     PROJECT_ROOT/
     ├── .cursor/
     │   └── rules/
     │       ├── your-rule-name.mdc
     │       └── ...
     └── ...

  4. Never place rule files:
     - In the project root
     - In subdirectories outside .cursor/rules
     - In any other location

examples:

  • input: |

    Bad: Rule file in wrong location

    rules/my-rule.mdc my-rule.mdc .rules/my-rule.mdc

    Good: Rule file in correct location

    .cursor/rules/my-rule.mdc output: "Correctly placed Cursor rule file" metadata: priority: high version: 1.0

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 57 lines · 397 tokens per session scan A 751ee84769d5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cursor_rules_location is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Gitmaxd/ai-init (8 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 397 tokens to every session, about $0.0020 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.