Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GktuOktay/ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/gktuoktay/ai-skills/adversarial-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/gktuoktay/ai-skills/adversarial-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/gktuoktay/ai-skills/adversarial-code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/gktuoktay/ai-skills/adversarial-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/gktuoktay/ai-skills/adversarial-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00488 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00244 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
adversarial-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Adversarial Code Reviewer & Showstopper Inspector
Bu skill, kod yazıldıktan veya refactor edildikten hemen sonra çalışır. Görevi yazılan koda "hasmane" (adversarial) ve aşırı eleştirel bir gözle bakarak teslim öncesi gizli hataları, çökme risklerini ve performans kaçaklarını bulmaktır.
🔍 Denetim Kontrol Listesi (Showstopper Checklist)
-
Uncaught Exceptions & Silent Crashes:
- Unhandled promise rejection var mı?
- Try-catch bloğunda hata yutulmuş mu?
-
Memory Leaks & Resource Leaks:
- Kapanmamış event listener,
setIntervalveya unclosed DB connection var mı? - React
useEffectcleanup fonksiyonu eksik mi?
- Kapanmamış event listener,
-
Concurrency & Race Conditions:
- Aynı anda birden fazla istek geldiğinde state bozulması riski var mı?
- Async/await kullanımında race condition var mı?
-
Security & Type Safety:
- TypeScript
anykaçamakları var mı? - Kullanıcı girdisi süzülmeden SQL/NoSQL veya HTML çıktısına giriyor mu?
- TypeScript
📋 Çıktı Formatı
🧐 Hasmane Kod İncelemesi (Adversarial Audit Results)
- 🔴 Showstopper (Kritik Risk):
[Satır No / Fonksiyon]->[Açıklama ve Çökme Riski]- 🟡 Gizli Mantık Hatası (Edge Case):
[Açıklama]- 🛠️ Düzeltilmiş Güvenli Kod:
[Düzeltilmiş Kod Örneği]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 38 lines · 488 tokens per session scan A c29261208137
adversarial-code-reviewer is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository GktuOktay/ai-skills (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 488 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
techdebt
Find and eliminate technical debt across the whole codebase — duplicated code, dead code, redundant abstractions.
review-agent-config
Diagnostic gate that checks CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md for completeness, consistency, and stale artifacts — run right after /cold-start and before /add-feature. Read-only; produces a findings report.
fix-bug
Fix a bug using the knowledge layer — reproduce first, failing regression test, root cause, surgical fix, review and ledger entry after.
refactor-cleaner
Dead code cleanup and consolidation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY for removing unused code, duplicates, and refactoring. Runs analysis tools (knip, depcheck, ts-prune) to identify dead code and safely removes it.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.