Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/golid-ai/golid/frontend-formsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/golid-ai/golidWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/golid-ai/golid/frontend-forms)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/golid-ai/golid/frontend-forms"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/golid-ai/golid/frontend-forms.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00980 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00490 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00196 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
frontend-forms scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Frontend Forms & Error Display
Thesis: Display page-load errors in Switch/Match states, submission errors via toast, and field-level errors inline. Keep user-visible submit state batched with its success or error branch.
Error Display Decision Tree
- API call fails during page load →
Switch/Matcherror state with<Alert>component - API call fails during form submit →
toast.error()with message - Field-level validation errors from backend → inline error messages under each input
- Network/auth errors → handled by
api.tsautomatically (401 refresh, etc.)
Form Submission Pattern
Uses batch() in both try and catch; do not put user-visible submit state
in finally.
const [saving, setSaving] = createSignal(false);
const [fieldErrors, setFieldErrors] = createSignal<Record<string, string>>({});
const handleSubmit = async () => {
setSaving(true);
setFieldErrors({});
try {
await api.create(formData);
if (!alive) return;
batch(() => {
setSaving(false);
toast.success("Created successfully");
});
onClose(); // or refetch
} catch (err) {
if (!alive) return;
const apiErr = err as {
message?: string;
details?: Record<string, string>;
};
batch(() => {
setSaving(false);
if (apiErr.details) {
setFieldErrors(apiErr.details);
} else {
toast.error(getErrorMessage(err, "Failed to create"));
}
});
}
// setSaving(false) is in both branches, wrapped in batch()
};
Why No finally
// BAD — finally runs unbatched after catch, creating intermediate visible state
try { ... }
catch { batch(() => { setError(msg); setSaving(false); }); }
finally { setSaving(false); } // runs AFTER catch, unbatched — error + saving both true briefly
// GOOD — setSaving(false) inside both branches, always in batch()
try {
if (!alive) return;
batch(() => { setSaving(false); toast.success("Done"); });
} catch {
if (!alive) return;
batch(() => { setSaving(false); toast.error("Failed"); });
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 119 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a397e1696dd9
frontend-forms is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository golid-ai/golid (40 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 980 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
adapter-features
Database-specific features must be implemented in the specialized adapter only. Base adapters (postgres, mysql, etc.) must remain database-agnostic.
unit-tests-tdd
TDD required for behavior changes; ≥80% package coverage on touched packages; unit-test conventions.
integration-tests
Human-readable integration test requests; helpers vs httptest; suites/ vs per-DB placement.
state-management
Use the following stack. Do not introduce or recommend Redux or React Context for shared/global state.
backend
You are an expert in Go, Gin, Gorm, Gen, Cosy (https://cosy.uozi.org/) with a deep understanding of best practices and performance optimization techniques in these technologies.
core
Core token-efficiency and response discipline rules. Always active.