Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GoranErhartic/cursor-development-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/goranerhartic/cursor-development-rules/sqs-processing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/goranerhartic/cursor-development-rules/sqs-processing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/goranerhartic/cursor-development-rules/sqs-processing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/goranerhartic/cursor-development-rules/sqs-processing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/goranerhartic/cursor-development-rules/sqs-processing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00387 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00155 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
sqs-processing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
SQS Processing Patterns
Critical Rule
Return only failed message IDs in batchItemFailures, not the entire batch. Lambda will retry only those messages.
Handler Signature
SQSHandler; return typePromise<SQSBatchResponse>;return { batchItemFailures: SQSBatchItemFailure[] }where each entry is{ itemIdentifier: record.messageId }
Processing Pattern
- Parse
event.Records; for each record parse body (JSON); validate with Zod (or similar); on success process and do not add to batchItemFailures; on catch push{ itemIdentifier: record.messageId }and continue (or break for FIFO) - Concurrent:
Promise.all(Records.map(...))when order does not matter - Sequential: For FIFO or order-sensitive, process in loop; after first failure you may push remaining messageIds to batchItemFailures to preserve order
- Add correlationId from message envelope to logger/tracer; create X-Ray subsegment per message if needed
Message Envelope
- Prefer envelope:
{ metadata: { correlationId }, body: payload }; parse once, validate payload, propagate correlationId to logger and downstream
Conventions
- Always return batchItemFailures for failed items; log total/failed/succeeded; use idempotency for state-changing work; validate message shape at entry
Anti-Patterns
- Returning full batch on partial failure; throwing without adding to batchItemFailures; no validation of message body; ignoring correlationId
See also: idempotency.mdc, error-handling.mdc, logging-setup.mdc, powertools-batch.mdc
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 032dd5020425
sqs-processing is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository GoranErhartic/cursor-development-rules (19 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 387 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
cloudflare-email-telegram-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for setting up email-to-Telegram forwarding via Cloudflare Email Routing and Workers using the mail2tg CLI.
implement-graceful-shutdown-for-your-application
Cursor rule "implement-graceful-shutdown-for-your-application" from PaulJPhilp/EffectPatterns, covering implement graceful shutdown for your application and example.
service-bindings
Worker-to-Worker RPC - bindings.worker() by name, WorkerEntrypoint callee, typed RPC deferred, requestId propagation.
hatch3r-scalability
CQ6 Scalability Quality measurement rule — stateless-handler ratio, back-pressure pattern adoption, idempotency-key adoption on POST/PUT/PATCH, queue offloading for >1s ops, pool sizing per concurrency profile.
cloudflare-workers-hono-angular-saas-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rule "cloudflare-workers-hono-angular-saas-cursorrules-prompt-file" from XD3an/awesome-ai-coding-all-in-one, covering cloudflare workers + hono + angular saas, stack, typescript, hono api and angular.
knative-istio-typesense-gpu-cursorrules-prompt-fil
description: "Cursor rules for Knative development with Istio, Typesense, and GPU integration." globs: / alwaysApply: false.