ralph-loop

A single-agent work loop driven by a product requirements document, or PRD, which describes what should be built. Each iteration selects an unfinished item, implements it, runs tests, and commits passing changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for sequential work with an approved plan, clear testable goals, and a reliable test suite, especially when several iterations are expected.
Why use it?
It provides a repeatable way to finish well-defined tasks when the completion conditions can be checked by automated tests.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/gosha70/code-copilot-team/ralph-loop
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gosha70/code-copilot-team

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 22 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,034 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00022 $0.01034
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00517
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00207
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00103

Measured yesterday against content hash a7d9cc833cf5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ralph-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

adapters/cursor/.cursor/rules/ralph-loop.mdc · 111 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Ralph Loop (Single-Agent Autonomous Loop)

A single agent runs in a loop until the task is complete. Each iteration reads a plan, picks the next incomplete item, implements it, runs tests, and commits if passing.

When to Use Ralph Loop vs Team Workflow

Factor Ralph Loop Team Workflow
Task scope Single-domain, well-defined Multi-domain, cross-cutting
Completion criteria Verifiable by tests Requires human judgment
Codebase familiarity Greenfield or well-understood Unfamiliar or complex
Design decisions needed Few or none (plan is locked) Many, iterative
Parallelism benefit Low (sequential work) High (independent domains)
Test suite Exists and reliable Missing or incomplete

Use Ralph Loop when:

  • The task has clear, testable completion criteria
  • A plan is already approved and doesn't need human decisions mid-flight
  • Work is sequential (each step depends on the previous)
  • You expect 3+ iterations to reach completion

Use Team Workflow when:

  • Multiple independent domains can be worked in parallel
  • The task requires human design decisions during implementation
  • There's no automated test suite to verify progress
  • The work spans unrelated parts of the codebase

How It Works

  1. PRD file — A structured plan with user stories, each marked pass/fail
  2. Progress file — Append-only log of what was done, what was learned
  3. Loop — Each iteration: read PRD → pick next failing story → implement → test → commit if passing → update progress → repeat
  4. Stop condition — All stories pass, or max iterations reached

Core Pattern

while true; do cat PROMPT.md | claude -p; done

Or use the official ralph-wiggum plugin which implements this via a Stop hook with safety guards.

PRD Format

{
  "stories": [
    { "id": "1", "description": "Set up project structure", "passes": true },
    { "id": "2", "description": "Implement data model", "passes": false },
    { "id": "3", "description": "Add API endpoints", "passes": false }
  ]
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 111 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 111 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A a7d9cc833cf5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ralph-loop is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository gosha70/code-copilot-team (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,034 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.