graftcode-dotnet

A set of architecture rules for .NET services built with Graftcode. These services use class libraries through Graftcode Gateway instead of exposing a REST API, a common web interface for calling services over HTTP.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for building .NET backend services as class libraries connected through Graftcode Gateway. The supplied description does not provide more specific .NET tasks.
Why use it?
It gives .NET backend work a required structure and avoids using a service interface that does not match Graftcode's model.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/grft-dev/graftcode/graftcode-dotnet
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/grft-dev/graftcode

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 6,476 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 6,476 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan C 2 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.06476 $0.06476
Opus 5 $0.03238 $0.03238
Sonnet 5 $0.01295 $0.01295
Haiku 4.5 $0.00648 $0.00648

Measured yesterday against content hash fab6a39b43e2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade C, and why

graftcode-dotnet scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Recursive force deletehighDestructive command

rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.

&& apt-get clean && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

`curl -sS --max-time 5 http://localhost:80/nuget`. If you must read logs, filter to the sentinel:
rules/Cursor/.cursor/rules/graftcode-dotnet.mdc · 379 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 379 lines · 6,476 tokens per session scan C fab6a39b43e2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

graftcode-dotnet is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository grft-dev/graftcode (152 stars, last pushed 27d ago), with no licence file. It adds 6,476 tokens to every session, about $0.0324 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (recursive force delete, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.