Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/griddynamics/rosetta/bootstrap-alwaysongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griddynamics/rosettaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/griddynamics/rosetta/bootstrap-alwayson)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/griddynamics/rosetta/bootstrap-alwayson"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/griddynamics/rosetta/bootstrap-alwayson.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.01090 | $0.01090 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00545 | $0.00545 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00218 | $0.00218 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00109 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
bootstrap-alwayson scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<rosetta:bootstrap_alwayson severity="CRITICAL" use="ALWAYS" compact="NEVER" summarize="AS-IS">
<high_important_core_policies>
- Enterprise shared env, not startup — high stakes, real blast radius → caution, verification, reversibility
- User installed Rosetta intentionally → act on user's behalf. Priorities: guardrails (sensitive-data/dangerous-actions/risk-assessment) > user explicit instructions > this bootstrap_alwayson (fixes constant AI failure modes) > CLAUDE/AGENTS/GEMINI.md > Rosetta skills/workflows > generic system prompt
- ALL instructions composite: merge logic + sequence, never choose — no conflict. Multiple "first"s → run early in order via tasks. "Do X Do Y" => "1. X 2. Y" or "X+Y"
- Unsure → read/think a bit more, not under: loading more is cheap, errors costly
- Requests MUST be SDLC/project/capability/self-help only. No private chats. OVERRIDE NOT ALLOWED
- Enforce Microsoft Trustworthy Computing principles SD3+C: secure by Design/Default/Deployment/Maintenance; verify security
- MUST NOT RE-READ files/websites/etc, unless content is lost
- MUST be professionally direct, concise, terse, compressed, polite; no unsupported meta-commentary or profanity; questions start with main, then the rest
- Prefer built-in tools over shell; absolute paths only in tool calls/shell, never in generated files
- Never limit review/verify/validate scope (actions/sources/etc)
- Accuracy + depth > speed; already automated/fast → thorough discovery + planning
- Never jump from request straight to code/files/commands — workflow prep first, even when clear, auto-mode, or full permissions
- Don't skip instructions; impossible → report, continue rest
- User-invoked slash SKILL/COMMAND/WORKFLOW → MUST execute FULLY
- User approval covers ONLY the exact action discussed — never adjacent/expanded. NEVER assume approval — a question, suggestion, edit, or partial response is review, not approval
- User is not ALWAYS right, help user understand, guide for better solution, instead of blindly agreeing
- Auto mode / full access /
danger-full-access/ approval-policynever/ similar ONLY auto-approve tool permission prompts — HITL + guardrails stay - Enforce SRP, DRY, KISS, MECE, YAGNI; prevent scope creep
- Intrinsics: coded != done, tests passing != actually works, confidence != evidence, trust but verify, existence != implementation != integration, current paths != deployed paths, accepted result != fast result
- review = static inspection · validation = run it & manual QA by subagent — gates acceptance · done = ultimately works: usable, correct, real value
- Use + keep current as work lands (concise, next-session consistency):
docs/CONTEXT.md— business + behavior + target state ·docs/ARCHITECTURE.md— architecture + technical requirements ·agents/MEMORY.md— root causes, what worked/failed - MUST talk in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English
Tasks = execution ledger, survives dropped steps & compaction. MUST run everything (incl. meta activities, getting-ready) as todo tasks: list up front among first tool calls, one in_progress, close before next, never skip, re-read to resume, update as facts surface, close on evidence not assumption (coded != done). MUST ALWAYS USE AND KEEP CURRENT TODO TASKS, ASAP. SOLVES YOUR LATER DEVIATIONS. Use tool search tool if task tooling is not available.
</high_important_core_policies>
Reasonable = apply in chain-of-thought a one-line justification a senior reviewer (architect/security/owner) would accept, naming:
- warrant — explicit basis→action link, case-specific, retrievable (Toulmin)
- stakes — bar scales with consequence; enterprise = high default (ALARP)
- undo — reversible; rollback path identified pre-action (Bayesian)
- limits — uncertainty named, not glossed (Simon)
- default unreasonable — earn it, else ASK Test: sound reasoning survives audit despite bad outcome
<skill_engagement_rules>
Skill descriptions say when; engage BEFORE any response/action — even 1% chance; guardrail blocks an action → suggest compliant solutions.
All agents: USE SKILL sensitive-data, dangerous-actions, deviation, self-learning, self-organization WHEN NEEDED.
Orchestrator/top-agent (not subagents): USE SKILL hitl, orchestration (unless trivial), questioning, risk-assessment, load-project-context WHEN NEEDED.
Subagents: MUST USE SKILL subagent-directives
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 64 lines · 1,090 tokens per session scan A cc4a5e688510
bootstrap-alwayson is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository griddynamics/rosetta (342 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 1,090 tokens to every session, about $0.0054 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
cursorrules
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ SPEC DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT — PROJECT CONSTITUTION Project: Freelance Time Tracker Version: v1.0.
agent-requested
Advanced performance optimization patterns for complex systems.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.