sage-update

sage-update is a cursor rule for Cursor from gustavobarbosab/sage. It costs 13 tokens per session (415 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A rule set for the SAGE /update command, which applies specific feedback to generated code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it with feedback about a missing test assertion, misplaced logic, or a violation of the project’s required technologies or structure.
Why use it?
It keeps requested changes tied to a stated specification and prevents unrelated edits or changes that conflict with project rules.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/gustavobarbosab/sage/sage-update
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gustavobarbosab/sage

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for sage-update

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/gustavobarbosab/sage/sage-update.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/gustavobarbosab/sage/sage-update)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/gustavobarbosab/sage/sage-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/gustavobarbosab/sage/sage-update.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 13 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 415 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00013 $0.00415
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.00208
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00083
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00042

Measured 4d ago against content hash 2347f0a488dd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

sage-update scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skill/cursor/.cursor/rules/sage-update.mdc · 53 lines

What it actually says

/sage update

Applies precise, spec-anchored feedback to generated code.

Inline argument

The user provides feedback inline:

/sage update "Scenario 'Double submit' is missing the assertion that no duplicate request is made"
/sage update "spec item 4 violated — navigation is inside the ViewModel, move it out"
/sage update "harness says Material3 only but the code imports Material2 Button"

If no argument is provided, ask: "What needs changing? Tie your feedback to a specific spec item or scenario."


Instructions

Read the feedback argument. Apply the requested changes to the relevant files.

Rules:

  • Do NOT introduce changes the user didn't request
  • Do NOT deviate from the harness
  • If a requested change would violate spec.md or behavior.md, flag it before applying: "⚠️ This change conflicts with [spec item / scenario]. Do you want to update the spec first?"
  • Return only the modified files in the same // FILE: format

What good feedback looks like

Guide the user toward precise feedback if theirs is vague:

"Scenario Double submit during loading is missing the assertion that no duplicate auth request is made""Spec item 'Generic error on auth failure' is violated — raw exception message is surfaced. Replace with a generic string resource.""Harness says navigation via lambda callbacks but LoginViewModel calls NavController directly."

"This doesn't look right" → ask: "Which spec item or scenario does it violate?""Make it cleaner" → ask: "What specifically should change?"


After update

Tell the user: "Changes applied. Review the updated files. Run /sage update <feedback> again for further changes, or /sage pr and /sage doc when ready to export."

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 53 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 2347f0a488dd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

sage-update is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository gustavobarbosab/sage (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 415 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.