Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamzaamjad/cursor-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/hamzaamjad/cursor-rules/213-sql-performance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/hamzaamjad/cursor-rules/213-sql-performance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/hamzaamjad/cursor-rules/213-sql-performance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/hamzaamjad/cursor-rules/213-sql-performance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/hamzaamjad/cursor-rules/213-sql-performance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00409 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00164 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
213-sql-performance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
sql-performance
Purpose: Ensure efficient, maintainable SQL queries. Research shows: Query optimization can reduce execution time by 10-100x and resource consumption by 50-90% (Ioannidis, 1996).
- Avoid
SELECT *; list required columns. - Use indexes, filter early in CTEs/subqueries.
- Limit row scans: prefer
WHEREclauses before joins. - Analyze and document query plans for long‐running queries.
- Break complex logic into modular views when appropriate.
- Tree of Thoughts Query Optimization:
- Generate 3 query approaches before executing
- Compare EXPLAIN ANALYZE results
- Select approach with lowest cost/rows ratio
- Example patterns:
-- Approach 1: Subquery filtering SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM orders WHERE date > '2024-01-01') o JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id; -- Approach 2: Join then filter SELECT * FROM orders o JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id WHERE o.date > '2024-01-01'; -- Approach 3: CTE with materialization hint WITH recent_orders AS MATERIALIZED ( SELECT * FROM orders WHERE date > '2024-01-01' ) SELECT * FROM recent_orders ro JOIN customers c ON ro.customer_id = c.id;
- Self-Consistency Validation: Run query 3 times, verify consistent execution plans
- Performance Targets:
- OLTP queries: <100ms for 95th percentile
- Analytics queries: <5s for 90th percentile
- Index hit ratio: >95% for frequent queries
- Chain of Code Verification: Include query cost calculations in comments
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c414944141c7
213-sql-performance is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository hamzaamjad/cursor-rules (2 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 409 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
as-contract-cast-smell
// ❌ WRONG — bypasses the family ContractSerializer seam const contract = JSON.parse(raw) as Contract; const contract = JSON.parse(raw) as Contract .
no-backward-compatibility
Do not add backward-compatibility shims or migration scaffolding.
postgresql
This guide defines the definitive best practices for writing clean, performant, and maintainable PostgreSQL SQL, focusing on modern conventions and avoiding common pitfalls.
ehs-ims-conventions
EHS IMS app — RBAC, data layer, tRPC, migrations, AI boundaries.
sync-timedb-archive-janitor-contract
Day-close / cold-path worker contracts for synctimedb (A invariants; B tick coordinator retired).
schema
Scalable and secure schema design patterns for relational databases, NoSQL, and APIs. / TR: İlişkisel veri tabanları, NoSQL ve API'ler için ölçeklenebilir ve güvenli şema tasarım kalıpları.