code-quality

A collection of coding standards and automated checks for JavaScript, TypeScript, CSS, and related files.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to configure linting, formatting, pre-commit checks, automated tests, and code review rules.
Why use it?
It catches common problems early and keeps formatting and review standards consistent across a project.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/hansonli05/cursor-rules-system/code-quality
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Hansonli05/Cursor-rules-system

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 803 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 803 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00803 $0.00803
Opus 5 $0.00402 $0.00402
Sonnet 5 $0.00161 $0.00161
Haiku 4.5 $0.00080 $0.00080

Measured yesterday against content hash c56e34db270f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/tech-stack/code-quality.mdc · 119 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Quality

Summary

Defines the tools, processes, and standards for maintaining high code quality throughout the development lifecycle.

Context

Automated code quality checks catch issues early, enforce consistency, and maintain high standards across the team. This system provides a safety net for code quality.

Instructions

Linting Configuration

  • ESLint for JavaScript/TypeScript code quality
  • Prettier for consistent code formatting
  • Stylelint for CSS/SCSS quality (if applicable)
  • Custom rules for project-specific patterns

Pre-commit Hooks

{
  "husky": {
    "hooks": {
      "pre-commit": "lint-staged",
      "commit-msg": "commitlint -E HUSKY_GIT_PARAMS"
    }
  },
  "lint-staged": {
    "*.{js,ts,tsx}": ["eslint --fix", "prettier --write"],
    "*.{css,scss}": ["stylelint --fix", "prettier --write"],
    "*.{md,json}": ["prettier --write"]
  }
}

Testing Standards

  • Unit Tests: Aim for 80%+ coverage on business logic
  • Integration Tests: Cover critical user flows
  • E2E Tests: Cover main application workflows
  • Test Naming: Descriptive test names that explain the scenario

Code Review Process

  1. Automated Checks: All CI checks must pass
  2. Peer Review: At least one team member review required
  3. Self Review: Author reviews their own changes first
  4. Documentation: Update relevant documentation

Quality Gates

  • Build Success: Code must compile without errors
  • Test Coverage: Maintain minimum coverage thresholds
  • Linting: No linting errors or warnings
  • Security: Pass security vulnerability scans
  • Performance: Meet performance benchmarks

Examples

ESLint Configuration Example

{
  "extends": [
    "eslint:recommended",
    "@typescript-eslint/recommended",
    "prettier"
  ],
  "rules": {
    "no-console": "warn",
    "no-unused-vars": "error",
    "@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any": "warn",
    "prefer-const": "error"
  }
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 119 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 119 lines · 803 tokens per session scan A c56e34db270f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-quality is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Hansonli05/Cursor-rules-system (2 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 803 tokens to every session, about $0.0040 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.