Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HeeGyeong/ComposeSampleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/heegyeong/composesample/data-rules)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/heegyeong/composesample/data-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/heegyeong/composesample/data-rules/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/heegyeong/composesample/data-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/heegyeong/composesample/data-rules.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00560 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00224 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
data-rules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
description: "Data Class Implementation Rules for Android Development" globs: "" alwaysApply: true
Data Class Implementation Rules
Overview
This rule defines the implementation guidelines for data classes in the Android project. Follow the comprehensive guidelines from DataRules.md.
Key Rules
Naming Conventions
- File Pattern:
{Domain}Data.ktor{Domain}ListData.kt(app model),{Domain}Response.kt(API response model) - Server fields: snake_case
- Client fields: camelCase
- Boolean flags: prefix with 'is' or 'has'
- YN flags: String type with "Y"/"N"
Gson ignores Kotlin defaults and null-safety
Unless every constructor parameter has a default, Gson creates the object without a constructor: a missing key leaves null in non-null fields and false in Boolean = true, and an explicit JSON null gets through either way. Response models therefore take nullable fields; defaults and required checks belong to a mapper (measured — see DataRules.md).
Required Structure
// API response model
data class ExampleResponse(
@SerializedName("server_field")
val clientField: Type?
)
// App model, built by the mapper
@Parcelize
data class ExampleData(
val clientField: Type
) : Parcelable
fun ExampleResponse.toExampleData() = ExampleData(
clientField = clientField ?: defaultValue // or requireNotNull(clientField)
)
Mandatory Annotations
- @SerializedName: REQUIRED for all API response fields
- @Parcelize: REQUIRED for Android component data transfer (on the app model)
Field Types
- Response models: every server-supplied field nullable; no Kotlin default values
- App models — required fields: Non-null types, checked with
requireNotNullin the mapper - App models — optional fields: Nullable types
- App models — collections: never null (
.orEmpty()in the mapper)
Companion Objects
companion object {
val EMPTY = DataModel("")
val MOCK = DataModel("test_data")
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +14 lines 9d7acc56c84c
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 01c2d5624cab
data-rules is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository HeeGyeong/ComposeSample (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 560 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
swiftui-guidelines-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for SwiftUI development guidelines.
gradle
Enforce modern Gradle build practices for Java and Android projects, focusing on Kotlin DSL, modularity, version catalogs, and performance optimizations.
compose-coroutines
Compose scroll/coroutine patterns — prevent programmatic scroll from being mistaken for user scroll, cancellation-safe flag resets.
android-viewmodel
Android ViewModel conventions — StateFlow, repository abstraction, coroutines, no LiveData.
trove-swift
Swift 6 and SwiftUI coding conventions for iOS development. Auto-activates when working with Swift files. Covers @Observable, async/await, NavigationStack, Swift Testing, and accessibility.
hatch3r-android-patterns
Android Kotlin conventions covering Jetpack Compose, coroutines + Flow, Hilt DI, Room, modular Gradle, AGP 8.x, target SDK 35, and Compose testing.