Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hhx465453939/mcp-pubmed-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/hhx465453939/mcp-pubmed-server/javascript-coding)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/hhx465453939/mcp-pubmed-server/javascript-coding"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/hhx465453939/mcp-pubmed-server/javascript-coding/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/hhx465453939/mcp-pubmed-server/javascript-coding"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/hhx465453939/mcp-pubmed-server/javascript-coding.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00525 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00210 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
javascript-coding scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
JavaScript编码规范
代码风格
- 使用 ES6+ 模块语法 (
import/export) - 使用 async/await 而非 Promise.then()
- 使用 const/let 而非 var
- 使用 模板字符串 而非字符串拼接
错误处理模式
// 标准错误处理模式
try {
const result = await someAsyncOperation();
return { success: true, data: result };
} catch (error) {
console.error(`[Module] Error:`, error.message);
throw new Error(`Operation failed: ${error.message}`);
}
缓存管理模式
// 缓存键生成
getCacheKey(query, maxResults, daysBack, sortBy) {
return `${query}|${maxResults}|${daysBack}|${sortBy}`;
}
// 缓存检查
getFromCache(key) {
const cached = this.cache.get(key);
if (cached && Date.now() - cached.timestamp < this.cacheTimeout) {
return cached.data;
}
return null;
}
API调用模式
// 速率限制
async enforceRateLimit() {
const now = Date.now();
const timeSinceLastRequest = now - this.lastRequestTime;
if (timeSinceLastRequest < RATE_LIMIT_DELAY) {
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, RATE_LIMIT_DELAY - timeSinceLastRequest));
}
this.lastRequestTime = Date.now();
}
工具方法命名
handle*- 处理工具调用fetch*- 获取外部数据format*- 格式化输出extract*- 提取信息clean*- 清理操作
日志规范
// 使用 console.error 输出调试信息(MCP服务器特性)
console.error(`[Module] Operation: ${operation} (${param})`);
console.error(`[Cache] Hit for key: ${key.substring(0, 50)}...`);
环境变量使用
// 环境变量访问模式
const API_KEY = process.env.PUBMED_API_KEY;
const EMAIL = process.env.PUBMED_EMAIL || '[email protected]';
const ABSTRACT_MODE = (process.env.ABSTRACT_MODE || 'quick').toLowerCase();
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 76 lines · 525 tokens per session scan A 3bb862d8f0a7
javascript-coding is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository hhx465453939/mcp-pubmed-server (6 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 525 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
config-validation-and-normalization
Config validation and normalization responsibilities (defineConfig normalizes, the orm section schema validates and resolves paths, the loader reports per-section diagnostics).