django-forms

django-forms is a cursor rule for coding agents from holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh. It costs 92 tokens per session, scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of Django rules for handling forms and model forms, which are web forms connected to database models. It covers validation and where to place form-related business logic.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when building Django forms, validating submitted data, connecting forms to models, and deciding whether logic belongs in a model, form, or view.
Why use it?
It keeps input checking in Django's standard validation system and prevents views from becoming overloaded with application logic.

Cursor rule

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/django-forms
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for django-forms

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/django-forms.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/django-forms)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/django-forms"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/django-forms.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 92 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 92 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00092 $0.00092
Opus 5 $0.00046 $0.00046
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00018
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00009

Measured 4d ago against content hash 3ce31ccaddc1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

django-forms scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

docs/rules/backend/python/django-best-practices/django-forms.mdc · 8 lines

What it actually says

  • 利用 Django 的表单和模型表单类进行表单处理和验证。
  • 使用 Django 的验证框架来验证表单和模型数据。
  • 将业务逻辑保留在模型和表单中;保持视图轻量,专注于请求处理。
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 8 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 3ce31ccaddc1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

django-forms is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh (232 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.