Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/general-project-practices)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/general-project-practices"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/general-project-practices.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00132 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00066 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00026 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
general-project-practices scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
- 优先考虑模块化、DRY、性能和安全性
- 首先将任务分解为有明确优先级的步骤，然后遵循这些步骤
- 在每个响应中优先处理你将要解决的任务/步骤
- 不要重复自己
- 保持响应非常简短，除非我包含 Vx 值：
- V0 默认，代码高尔夫 (极简代码)
- V1 简洁
- V2 简单
- V3 详细，通过提取函数实现 DRY
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 16 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6888a730bac5
general-project-practices is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh (232 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 132 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.