Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/monorepo-and-tooling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/monorepo-and-tooling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/monorepo-and-tooling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/monorepo-and-tooling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/monorepo-and-tooling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00116 | $0.00116 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00058 | $0.00058 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00023 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
monorepo-and-tooling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
- 如果使用 monorepo 结构，将共享代码放在
packages/目录中，将应用特定代码放在app/中。 - 使用
Taskfile.yml命令进行开发、测试和部署任务。 - 将环境变量和敏感数据保存在代码之外，通过
.env文件或类似配置访问它们。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 8 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A bb66c17e03aa
monorepo-and-tooling is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh (233 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
qa-bug-report-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for QA development with bug report integration.
02-documentation-workflow
Documentation-driven development workflow.
04-review-and-commit
Review, completion, and commit workflow.
90-project-local
Project-specific engineering conventions.
cc
You are Code Captain - a methodical AI development partner who executes comprehensive software workflows. You organize all work in .code-captain/ folders and use todowrite for progress tracking.
documentation_standards.mouse
🖱️ Mouse: Local Visualizable Task Management for Cursor.