Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00065 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00032 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00013 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
- 应用 Django 的安全最佳实践（例如，CSRF 保护、SQL 注入保护、XSS 预防）。
- 在开发的每个阶段都优先考虑安全和性能优化。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 7 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 44915bae2216
security is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh (233 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 65 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
cursorrules
You are an expert backend API developer. Follow these rules strictly for REST APIs, GraphQL servers, and microservices.
app-router-patterns
Next.js 14+ App Router patterns — Server Components, Client Components, Route Handlers, Server Actions, and metadata API.
skill-rails-api
Padrões DARE para APIs em Ruby on Rails 8 — API mode, ActiveRecord, Solid Queue, Solid Cable, Action Cable, strong parameters, services, serializers (Blueprinter/Alba), Devise/JWT, rack-attack, rswag/grape-swagger.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.