cursor_conductor_task_management

cursor_conductor_task_management is a cursor rule for coding agents from hridaya423/conductor-tasks. It costs 0 tokens per session (720 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of rules for managing tasks in Conductor Tasks, a task-tracking workflow for AI-assisted development. It covers task clarity, priorities, dependencies, and status updates.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to break down broad tasks, decide what work can start, set priorities, track progress, and record dependencies.
Why use it?
It helps prevent vague tasks from being started and makes blocked or dependent work visible.

Cursor rule

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/hridaya423/conductor-tasks/cursor_conductor_task_management
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hridaya423/conductor-tasks

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for cursor_conductor_task_management

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/hridaya423/conductor-tasks/cursor_conductor_task_management.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/hridaya423/conductor-tasks/cursor_conductor_task_management)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/hridaya423/conductor-tasks/cursor_conductor_task_management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/hridaya423/conductor-tasks/cursor_conductor_task_management.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Nothing until a file matches its globs; then the whole rule loads.
When invoked 720 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00720
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00360
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00144
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00072

Measured 4d ago against content hash 4fc6063a685a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cursor_conductor_task_management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

src/ide/rule_templates/cursor_conductor_task_management.mdc · 49 lines

What it actually says


description: Best practices for effective task management with Conductor Tasks in an AI-assisted workflow globs: */ alwaysApply: true

Conductor Task Management: Best Practices

Complementing the main Conductor Tasks AI Development Workflow, these are best practices for managing tasks effectively:

  1. Task Granularity and Clarity:

    • Strive for tasks (and especially sub-tasks) that are well-defined, actionable, and have clear, verifiable outcomes.
    • If a task received via `get-next-task` or `get-task` is too vague or overly broad, use `expand-task` to break it down, or use `ask_followup_question` to seek clarification from the user before extensive work.
  2. Effective Use of Task Attributes:

    • Priorities: Understand that `get-next-task` likely uses priority. If you create tasks, assign appropriate priorities ("high", "medium", "low").
    • Dependencies: Correctly identify and manage dependencies. A task should only be started if its dependencies are 'completed'. If you identify a missing dependency for an existing task, note it or suggest an update.
    • Status: Update status promptly and accurately (e.g., "in progress" when you start, "blocked" if you hit a roadblock, "review" if it needs human checking, "completed" when done).
  3. Comprehensive Note-Taking (`add-task-note`):

    • This cannot be overemphasized. Your notes are the "paper trail" of your work.
    • Include:
      • Your understanding of the task.
      • The plan you formulated.
      • Specific files you read, wrote, or modified (mentioning tool usage like `read_file`, `apply_diff`).
      • Commands executed via `execute_command` and their relevant output/results.
      • Any errors encountered and how you resolved them.
      • Questions you asked and answers received.
      • Assumptions made.
    • Good notes help human collaborators, your future self (in longer sessions), and improve overall project transparency.
  4. Iterative Refinement:

    • Don't assume the initial task description or breakdown is perfect.
    • As you implement, you may uncover new requirements or realize a different approach is better. Document these insights using `add-task-note` and, if necessary, suggest creating new tasks or updating existing ones.
  5. Linking to Code:

    • When documenting work in task notes, referencing specific task IDs in commit messages (if you guide the user on commits) or PR descriptions can greatly improve traceability between the task management system and the codebase. Example: "Fix: Resolve issue in login flow (TASK-123)".
  6. Proactive Problem Identification:

    • If you foresee issues, such as a task missing critical information, a dependency conflict, or a potentially flawed plan, raise these concerns early using `add-task-note` and potentially `ask_followup_question`.

By following these practices, you can leverage Conductor Tasks more effectively as an AI assistant, leading to smoother development cycles and better project outcomes.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 49 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4fc6063a685a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cursor_conductor_task_management is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository hridaya423/conductor-tasks (74 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 720 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.