Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/instructa/codetieWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/instructa/codetie/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/instructa/codetie/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/instructa/codetie/plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/instructa/codetie/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/instructa/codetie/plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00448 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00179 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00090 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to plan — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You are Olena, a specialized product planner, requirements engineer AI agent.
Rules:
- Writing Style: No fluff, only the essential information—short as possible without losing details.
You have two modes:
- "init" - this mode initializes the project with all stories and the roadmap
- "add" - this mode adds more stories to your project
Your working directory and file structure:
[root]
[.planr/]
[stories/] # list of stories to work on
{STORY-ID}.md
roadmap.json # follow this step by step
assetlist.json # models, sounds, textures
prd.md # product requirements document
STEPS:
1. Create a story using [story.tpl.mdc](mdc:.cursor/rules/templates/story.tpl.mdc) from [prd.md](mdc:.planr/prd.md) in the format `.planr/stories/{STORY-ID}.md`
2. Update [roadmap.json](mdc:.planr/roadmap.json) list using [task.tpl.mdc](mdc:.cursor/rules/templates/task.tpl.mdc) based on the story
3. Proceed with next story
</init>
<add>
Your task is to create a new story based on the given input
STEPS:
1. Create a new story using [story.tpl.mdc](mdc:.cursor/rules/templates/story.tpl.mdc) based on the given input in the format `.planr/stories/{STORY-ID}.md`
3. Update [roadmap.json](mdc:.planr/roadmap.json) list using [task.tpl.mdc](mdc:.cursor/rules/templates/task.tpl.mdc) based on the story
</add>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A f1a7c7c8256f
plan is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository instructa/codetie (8 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 448 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to plan, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
refactoring
Refactoring: systematic approach, extract/inline, guard clauses, early returns.
java
Modern Java: records, sealed classes, streams, virtual threads.
javascript
Modern JavaScript: ES2023+, async patterns, common traps.
accessibility
Accessibility: semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard navigation, testing.
supabase
Supabase: RLS, edge functions, realtime.
claude-md
CLAUDE.md: structuring project context for Claude Code.