javascript-injection

javascript-injection is a cursor rule for Cursor from ivangrynenko/cursorrules. It costs 1,984 tokens per session, scanned A, original, MIT.

A JavaScript security rule for spotting injection risks, where input is treated as code or markup instead of ordinary data.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing uses of eval and dynamic HTML, especially when those operations involve requests, query values, or other user input.
Why use it?
It helps identify patterns that could let attackers run code or place unsafe content into a page.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/.

Good fit Use it when reviewing uses of eval and dynamic HTML, especially when those operations involve requests, query values, or other user input.

Compare 6 cursor rules from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/javascript-injection
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ivangrynenko/cursorrules

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for javascript-injection

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/javascript-injection/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/javascript-injection)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/javascript-injection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/javascript-injection/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for javascript-injection

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/javascript-injection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/javascript-injection.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 1,984 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 1,984 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 2 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.01984 $0.01984
Opus 5.5 $0.00794 $0.00794
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00397 $0.00397
Haiku 4.5 $0.00198 $0.00198

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 2320cdbcffa0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

javascript-injection scanned grade A with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Unrestricted tool accesslowExcessive agency

A wildcard tool grant or "run any command" leaves no least-privilege boundary at all.

Impact: Attackers can execute arbitrary code in your application context.

Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.

Runs shell commandslowCapability

Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.

// Use child_process.execFile with separate arguments
Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

.cursor/rules/javascript-injection.mdc · 217 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 217 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

JavaScript Injection Security Rule

actions:

  • type: enforce conditions:
    • pattern: "eval\(([^)](req|request|query|param|user|input)[^)])\)" severity: "critical" message: | 🔴 CRITICAL: Potential code injection vulnerability detected.

      Impact: Attackers can execute arbitrary code in your application context. CWE Reference: CWE-95 (Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code)

      ❌ Insecure: eval(req.body.data)

      ✅ Secure Alternative: // Use safer alternatives like JSON.parse for JSON data try { const data = JSON.parse(req.body.data); // Process data safely } catch (error) { // Handle parsing errors } learn_more_url: "https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Direct_Dynamic_Code_Evaluation_Eval_Injection"

    • pattern: "\$\(\s*(['"])<[^>]+>\1\s*\)" severity: "high" message: | 🟠 HIGH: jQuery HTML injection vulnerability detected.

      Impact: This can lead to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. CWE Reference: CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation)

      ❌ Insecure: $("" + userProvidedData + "")

      ✅ Secure Alternative: // Create element safely, then set text content const div = $(""); div.text(userProvidedData); learn_more_url: "https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/jQuery_Security_Cheat_Sheet.html"

    • pattern: "document\.write\(|document\.writeln\(" severity: "high" message: | 🟠 HIGH: Potential DOM-based XSS vulnerability.

      Impact: Attackers can inject malicious HTML/JavaScript into your page. CWE Reference: CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation)

      ❌ Insecure: document.write("" + userGeneratedContent + "");

      ✅ Secure Alternative: // Use safer DOM manipulation methods const h1 = document.createElement("h1"); h1.textContent = userGeneratedContent; document.body.appendChild(h1); learn_more_url: "https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/DOM_based_XSS_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html"

    • pattern: "innerHTML\s*=|outerHTML\s*=" pattern_negate: "sanitize|DOMPurify|escapeHTML" severity: "high" message: | 🟠 HIGH: Potential DOM-based XSS through innerHTML/outerHTML.

      Impact: Setting HTML content directly can allow script injection. CWE Reference: CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation)

      ❌ Insecure: element.innerHTML = userProvidedData;

      ✅ Secure Alternative: // Option 1: Use textContent instead for text element.textContent = userProvidedData;

      // Option 2: Sanitize if HTML is required import DOMPurify from 'dompurify'; element.innerHTML = DOMPurify.sanitize(userProvidedData); learn_more_url: "https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/DOM_based_XSS_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html"

    • pattern: "\$\(.*\)\.html\(" pattern_negate: "sanitize|DOMPurify|escapeHTML" severity: "high" message: | 🟠 HIGH: jQuery HTML injection risk detected.

      Impact: Setting HTML content can lead to XSS vulnerabilities. CWE Reference: CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation)

      ❌ Insecure: $("#element").html(userProvidedData);

Read the full file on GitHub · 217 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 217 lines · 1,984 tokens per session scan A 2320cdbcffa0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

javascript-injection is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository ivangrynenko/cursorrules (88 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1,984 tokens to every session, about $0.0079 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 2 findings (unrestricted tool access, runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.