Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ivangrynenko/cursorrulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/multi-agent-coordination)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/multi-agent-coordination"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/multi-agent-coordination/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/multi-agent-coordination"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/multi-agent-coordination.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00320 | $0.00320 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00128 | $0.00128 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00064 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
multi-agent-coordination scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- multi-agent-coordination — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
Multi-Agent Coordination Standards
Ensures consistent coordination between different AI agents and roles.
actions:
-
type: enforce conditions:
-
pattern: "// TODO:|#\s*TODO:" message: "Convert TODO comments into structured task breakdowns for multi-agent coordination"
-
pattern: "function\s+[a-zA-Z]+Agent\s*\([^)]*\)" message: "Implement proper agent role separation and communication"
-
pattern: "// FIXME:|#\s*FIXME:" message: "Convert FIXME into specific tasks with acceptance criteria"
-
-
type: suggest message: | Multi-Agent Coordination Best Practices:
- Separate Planner and Executor roles
- Document task breakdowns and success criteria
- Track progress in structured format
- Use proper inter-agent communication
- Maintain clear role boundaries
- Focus on immediate, actionable solutions
- Provide context for complex tasks
- Use natural language for requirements
- Break down complex workflows
- Document dependencies between tasks
metadata: priority: high version: 1.0
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 320 tokens per session scan A ff0144b37a17
multi-agent-coordination is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository ivangrynenko/cursorrules (88 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 320 tokens to every session, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
refactoring
Refactoring: systematic approach, extract/inline, guard clauses, early returns.
cross-tool-config
Cross-tool AI config: what transfers between Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Windsurf, Gemini, and Codex.
angular
Angular: signals, standalone components, RxJS patterns.
django
Django: models, views, ORM best practices.
fastapi
FastAPI: Pydantic v2, dependency injection, async.
tailwind-css
Tailwind CSS: utility patterns, design tokens, component extraction.