Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jamro/tiny-engineerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/jamro/tiny-engineer/conventional-commits)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jamro/tiny-engineer/conventional-commits"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jamro/tiny-engineer/conventional-commits/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jamro/tiny-engineer/conventional-commits"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jamro/tiny-engineer/conventional-commits.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00524 | $0.00524 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00210 | $0.00210 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00105 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00052 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
conventional-commits scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed · -4 tokens per session 4bb83f9d6955
- 19d ago Changed · +3 lines · +82 tokens per session 84aee669b312
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines · +42 tokens per session 71f309300efd
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines · +25 tokens per session 63c9bd53ea89
- 1mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 379 tokens per session scan A c012c239a775
conventional-commits is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository jamro/tiny-engineer (694 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 524 tokens to every session, about $0.0021 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-10.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
commit-authorship
Git commits must be authored by the user only (no Cursor co-author).
git-conventional-commit-messages
Cursor rules for Git development with conventional commit messages integration.
python-github-setup-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Python development with GitHub setup integration.
commit-message-generation-rule
Rules for writing consistent Git commit messages, using labels such as feat for a feature, fix for a bug, and docs for documentation. A commit message records one set of code changes.
atomic-commits
Git best practices - atomic commits, descriptive messages, feature branches.
quality-gates
Enforce quality checks before commits - lint, typecheck, and test affected code.