Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jgardner04/Ghost-MCP-ServerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/jgardner04/ghost-mcp-server/dev_workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jgardner04/ghost-mcp-server/dev_workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jgardner04/ghost-mcp-server/dev_workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jgardner04/ghost-mcp-server/dev_workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jgardner04/ghost-mcp-server/dev_workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.04568 | $0.04568 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.01827 | $0.01827 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00914 | $0.00914 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00457 | $0.00457 |
Grade A, and why
dev_workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to windsurfrules — 161 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 334 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
-
Global CLI Commands
- Task Master now provides a global CLI through the
task-mastercommand - All functionality from
scripts/dev.jsis available through this interface - Install globally with
npm install -g claude-task-masteror use locally vianpx - Use
task-master <command>instead ofnode scripts/dev.js <command> - Examples:
task-master listinstead ofnode scripts/dev.js listtask-master nextinstead ofnode scripts/dev.js nexttask-master expand --id=3instead ofnode scripts/dev.js expand --id=3
- All commands accept the same options as their script equivalents
- The CLI provides additional commands like
task-master initfor project setup
- Task Master now provides a global CLI through the
-
Development Workflow Process
- Start new projects by running
task-master initornode scripts/dev.js parse-prd --input=<prd-file.txt>to generate initial tasks.json - Begin coding sessions with
task-master listto see current tasks, status, and IDs - Analyze task complexity with
task-master analyze-complexity --researchbefore breaking down tasks - Select tasks based on dependencies (all marked 'done'), priority level, and ID order
- Clarify tasks by checking task files in tasks/ directory or asking for user input
- View specific task details using
task-master show <id>to understand implementation requirements - Break down complex tasks using
task-master expand --id=<id>with appropriate flags - Clear existing subtasks if needed using
task-master clear-subtasks --id=<id>before regenerating - Implement code following task details, dependencies, and project standards
- Verify tasks according to test strategies before marking as complete
- Mark completed tasks with
task-master set-status --id=<id> --status=done - Update dependent tasks when implementation differs from original plan
- Generate task files with
task-master generateafter updating tasks.json - Maintain valid dependency structure with
task-master fix-dependencieswhen needed - Respect dependency chains and task priorities when selecting work
- Report progress regularly using the list command
- Start new projects by running
-
Task Complexity Analysis
- Run
node scripts/dev.js analyze-complexity --researchfor comprehensive analysis - Review complexity report in scripts/task-complexity-report.json
- Or use
node scripts/dev.js complexity-reportfor a formatted, readable version of the report - Focus on tasks with highest complexity scores (8-10) for detailed breakdown
- Use analysis results to determine appropriate subtask allocation
- Note that reports are automatically used by the expand command
- Run
-
Task Breakdown Process
- For tasks with complexity analysis, use
node scripts/dev.js expand --id=<id> - Otherwise use
node scripts/dev.js expand --id=<id> --subtasks=<number> - Add
--researchflag to leverage Perplexity AI for research-backed expansion - Use
--prompt="<context>"to provide additional context when needed - Review and adjust generated subtasks as necessary
- Use
--allflag to expand multiple pending tasks at once - If subtasks need regeneration, clear them first with
clear-subtaskscommand
- For tasks with complexity analysis, use
-
Implementation Drift Handling
- When implementation differs significantly from planned approach
- When future tasks need modification due to current implementation choices
- When new dependencies or requirements emerge
- Call
node scripts/dev.js update --from=<futureTaskId> --prompt="<explanation>"to update tasks.json
-
Task Status Management
- Use 'pending' for tasks ready to be worked on
- Use 'done' for completed and verified tasks
- Use 'deferred' for postponed tasks
- Add custom status values as needed for project-specific workflows
-
Task File Format Reference
# Task ID: <id> # Title: <title> # Status: <status> # Dependencies: <comma-separated list of dependency IDs> # Priority: <priority> # Description: <brief description> # Details: <detailed implementation notes> # Test Strategy: <verification approach>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 334 lines · 4,568 tokens per session scan A 1187dd5bd109
dev_workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository jgardner04/Ghost-MCP-Server (8 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 4,568 tokens to every session, about $0.0183 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to windsurfrules, differing in 161 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
slice-tasks
PLANNING SPINE STEP 2 of 3 — Slice the work: break a scoped PRD into vertical-slice stories in specs/epics/. Use after scope-work (step 1), before plan-work (step 3). Not a substitute for scope-work or plan-work.
iris
GitHub operations specialist — branches, pull requests, issues, releases, tags. Called by zeus after review. Never pushes or merges without explicit human approval. Integrates with VS Code GitHub Pull Requests extension.
elite-orchestrator
Elite orchestrator for mission-critical, enterprise-scale tasks requiring strategic coordination of 7+ agents across all domains. Makes architectural decisions, manages risk, ensures business continuity, and delivers enterprise-grade outcomes. Use for platform migrations, security incidents, multi-system integrations…
project-onboarding-rule
Automatically onboards existing projects into the AI-driven development workflow.
linear-in-review
After finishing a Linear issue, set its status to In Review (never Done).
sprint-planning
BMAD BMM Agent: sprint-planning.