Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jkudjo/oh-my-cursorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/deep-interview)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/deep-interview"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/deep-interview/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/deep-interview"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/deep-interview.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00992 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00397 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00198 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
deep-interview scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
@deep-interview
Trigger: When scope, intent, or requirements are unclear. Use before @ralplan or @ralph on any non-trivial task.
Depth Profiles
| Flag | Threshold | Max Rounds | Use when |
|---|---|---|---|
--quick |
≤ 0.30 | 5 | Minor changes, mostly clear intent |
--standard (default) |
≤ 0.20 | 12 | Features, refactors |
--deep |
≤ 0.15 | 20 | Architecture changes, large scope |
Protocol
Phase 0 — Preflight
- Call
start_modewith mode=deep-interviewand the raw task. - Classify: greenfield (new) vs brownfield (existing codebase). For brownfield, read relevant files first — never ask the user for facts you can discover.
- Call
save_artifacttype=context, slug=deep-interview-{task-slug}, with initial snapshot:Task: ... Hypothesis: why the user likely wants this Known facts: ... Unknowns: ... Decision boundaries: ...
Phase 1 — Interview Loop
Repeat until ambiguity ≤ threshold OR max rounds reached:
-
Ask ONE question targeting the weakest clarity dimension.
- Never batch questions. One question per turn.
- Priority order: Intent → Outcome → Scope → Non-goals → Decision Boundaries → Constraints → Success Criteria
- For brownfield: use evidence-backed questions ("I see X in Y — should changes follow that pattern?")
- After each answer: probe assumptions, not just facts. Ask for evidence, counterexamples, or tradeoffs before moving to the next dimension.
-
Score ambiguity after each answer (0.0 = fully clear, 1.0 = fully unclear):
Greenfield:
ambiguity = 1 - (intent×0.30 + outcome×0.25 + scope×0.20 + constraints×0.15 + success×0.10)Brownfield:
ambiguity = 1 - (intent×0.25 + outcome×0.20 + scope×0.20 + constraints×0.15 + success×0.10 + context×0.10) -
Show progress each round:
Round N | Ambiguity: 0.XX → 0.XX | Focus: {dimension} -
Call
update_mode_statewithphase={dimension}anditeration=N.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 99 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 66cde96adc9e
deep-interview is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Jkudjo/oh-my-cursor (1 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 992 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
refactoring
Refactoring: systematic approach, extract/inline, guard clauses, early returns.
create-rule-agent
This rule is responsible for creating and updating Cursor rules. Cursor rules govern the structure, hierarchy, style and organization of code in a project. This rule should be invoked in Agent mode when: 1. a user wants to create a new cursor rule, 2. a user wants to update or change an existing rule, 3. user wants…
cloudflare-workers-hono-auto
Cloudflare Workers with Hono framework development standards and best practices.
changelog-generator-manual
This rule generates a comprehensive changelog.md file by analyzing all git tags and commits, creating a chronological record of all project changes with proper semantic versioning structure. The changelog.md file is stored at the root of the project.
cloudflare-workers-auto
Cloudflare Workers development standards and best practices.
vue3-typescript-auto
Vue 3 with TypeScript Standards.