Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jkudjo/oh-my-cursorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/git-master)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/git-master"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/git-master/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/git-master"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/git-master.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00489 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00196 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
git-master scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
@git-master
Trigger: Any git workflow operation.
Operations
@git-master clean-commit
- Review staged/unstaged changes — remove debug code, console.logs, commented-out code.
- Stage only relevant files. Never stage:
.env, secrets, unrelated changes. - Write commit message in conventional format:
feat(scope): short description— new capabilityfix(scope): short description— bug fixrefactor(scope): short description— no behavior changetest(scope): short description— tests onlydocs(scope): short description— docs onlychore(scope): short description— tooling, deps
- Body (if needed): explain WHY, not what. The diff shows what.
- Run:
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF' ... EOF)"
@git-master prep-pr
git log base..HEAD— list all commits in this branch.git diff base...HEAD— full diff.- Write PR description:
## What [1-3 bullet points] ## Why [motivation / linked issue] ## How [approach, key decisions] ## Test plan - [ ] item - Verify checklist: no secrets, no debug code, tests pass, no unintended files.
@git-master resolve-conflicts
- List conflicted files:
git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U - For each conflict: read both sides carefully before choosing.
- Merge intent of both when possible. Flag any that need human judgment.
- After resolving: run tests to verify.
@git-master summarize
git log --oneline base..HEAD- Group changes: Features | Fixes | Refactors | Breaking changes
- Write a clean changelog section.
Rules
- Never force-push to main/master.
- Never commit secrets, tokens, or credentials.
- Conventional commits format — always.
- PR is not "ready" until tests pass and checklist is clean.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 62 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 33de1f112f27
git-master is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Jkudjo/oh-my-cursor (1 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 489 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
release-commit-analysis-auto
This rule analyzes commits to determine if they should trigger a version bump. It categorizes conventional and non-conventional commits into Features, Bug Fixes, Breaking Changes, Documentation, and Other. It uses intelligent keyword matching for non-conventional commits and analyzes file changes to help categorize…
git-workflow
Git workflow: commits, branches, PRs, history management.
changelog-generator-manual
This rule generates a comprehensive changelog.md file by analyzing all git tags and commits, creating a chronological record of all project changes with proper semantic versioning structure. The changelog.md file is stored at the root of the project.
release-git-tags-auto
This rule checks for existing tags before creating new ones. It also offers to push the tag to the remote repository. It runs when users request release creation, version bumping, or package publishing.
release-validation-auto
This rule validates release prerequisites including branch naming conventions and package.json structure. It runs when users request release creation, version bumping, or package publishing. The rule ensures releases only occur from appropriate branches (release/, hotfix/, fix/) and validates package.json exists with…
release-version-bump-auto
Apply when the user is creating or preparing a release, version bump, tag, publish, or deploy. Validates semantic version bumps against change analysis (breaking/feat/fix), blocks inappropriate bumps, and guides major/minor/patch or custom version choice. Use for release workflows, package versioning, and…