Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jkudjo/oh-my-cursorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/resume)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/resume"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/resume/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/resume"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/resume.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00540 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00216 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00108 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
resume scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
@resume
Trigger: At the start of a session when continuing previous work.
Protocol
Phase 1 — Load checkpoint
- Call
get_session_context— load active modes, plans, memories, last checkpoint. - Call
load_checkpoint(no ID) — load the latest checkpoint. - Present resume summary:
## Resuming session Last checkpoint: {created_at} Summary: {what was done} Next steps: {what to do now} Blockers: {any blockers} Active modes: {list} Approved plan: {plan title or "none"}
Phase 2 — State drift detection (critical)
Before executing anything, validate persisted assumptions against current reality.
Check each of the following and flag any that have drifted:
Codebase drift
- Do the files referenced in the plan still exist at the same paths?
- Have the functions/classes the plan depends on been renamed or removed?
- Are there new commits since the checkpoint that change the affected area?
Environment drift
- Are the environment variables the plan assumes still set?
- Has the DB schema changed since the plan was created?
- Are the services the plan depends on still running?
Plan validity
- Is the approved plan still the right approach given current state?
- Have any of the plan's assumptions been invalidated?
For each drift found, report:
⚠️ DRIFT DETECTED: {what changed}
Was: {what was assumed}
Now: {what is actually true}
Impact: {how this affects the plan}
Action: [update plan | re-interview | proceed with caveat]
If significant drift is found: recommend @deep-interview to re-scope before proceeding.
If minor drift: note it and continue with caveats.
If no drift: confirm "State validated — no drift detected."
Phase 3 — Continue
After drift check:
- If plan is still valid: execute next steps from checkpoint
- If plan needs update: call
save_planwith updated content before proceeding - Restore active mode with
update_mode_stateif a mode was active
Rules
- Never skip the drift check when resuming — a confidently outdated plan is worse than starting fresh.
- Drift check must use live code/config, not memory — read the actual files.
- If drift is detected but ignored, explicitly note the risk in the session log.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 5fa005bcd470
resume is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Jkudjo/oh-my-cursor (1 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 540 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
100-memory-system
Comprehensive Memory System architecture for autonomous Cursor operation.
memory-protocol
A protocol for storing and retrieving project memories from files, using a command-line memory tool. It records decisions, preferences, dates, tasks, and other useful history for later conversations.
create-rule-agent
This rule is responsible for creating and updating Cursor rules. Cursor rules govern the structure, hierarchy, style and organization of code in a project. This rule should be invoked in Agent mode when: 1. a user wants to create a new cursor rule, 2. a user wants to update or change an existing rule, 3. user wants…
changelog-generator-manual
This rule generates a comprehensive changelog.md file by analyzing all git tags and commits, creating a chronological record of all project changes with proper semantic versioning structure. The changelog.md file is stored at the root of the project.
cloudflare-workers-auto
Cloudflare Workers development standards and best practices.
vue3-typescript-auto
Vue 3 with TypeScript Standards.