Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jkudjo/oh-my-cursorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00361 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00144 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
@tdd
Trigger: When building a new function, module, or feature from scratch, or reproducing a bug.
Protocol
Red phase — write failing tests
- Read clarified scope from
get_memorykey=clarified-scope(if available). - Write tests that define the contract:
- Happy path: normal inputs produce expected outputs
- Edge cases: empty, null, boundary values, large inputs
- Error cases: invalid inputs raise correct errors
- Run the tests. All must fail (red). If any pass, the test is wrong — fix it.
- Call
update_mode_statemode=tdd-likephase=red(use deep-interview mode as proxy if tdd not registered).
Green phase — minimum implementation
- Write the minimum code to make all tests pass.
- Run tests. Iterate until green.
- No over-engineering — if tests pass with 5 lines, write 5 lines.
Refactor phase — clean without breaking
- Identify: duplication, poor naming, long functions, unclear logic.
- Refactor — do NOT change observable behavior.
- Run tests. Must still be green.
Commit
- Two commits:
test: add tests for {feature}feat: implement {feature}
Rules
- Tests before implementation — always, no exceptions.
- Never delete or skip tests to make them pass.
- Never modify tests in the green/refactor phase.
- If a test seems impossible to pass: the design may be wrong — revisit the interface.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A dac3d5e50982
tdd is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Jkudjo/oh-my-cursor (1 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 361 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
refactoring
Refactoring: systematic approach, extract/inline, guard clauses, early returns.
test_workflow
Before implementing the TDD workflow, ensure your project has a proper testing framework configured. This section covers setup for different technology stacks.
bug-fix-tdd-guard
A rule for fixing software bugs with test-driven development, or TDD: first reproduce the bug, then write a test that fails, then make the smallest code change that passes it, and finally run the full checks.
android_unit_testing_bdd
Unit testing best practices with BDD style.
testing
Testing: test design, mocking strategy, coverage philosophy.
jest
Jest: describe/it, matchers, mocking, async testing.