Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jkudjo/oh-my-cursorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/ultrawork)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/ultrawork"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/ultrawork/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/ultrawork"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/ultrawork.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00522 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00209 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
ultrawork scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
@ultrawork
Trigger: When you want the complete workflow executed at maximum rigor with no shortcuts.
This is @explore + @deep-interview + @ralplan + @tdd/@ralph + @review + @security-review + @qa + @pipeline + @git-master prep-pr run as a single coordinated sequence.
Protocol
- Call
start_modemode=autopilottask=ultrawork: {task}. - Call
save_checkpointat the start so you can resume if interrupted.
Phase 1 — Understand (explore + deep-interview)
- Run
@exploreto map the relevant subsystem. - Score ambiguity. If > 0.3: run
@deep-interview --standard. - Save clarified scope to memory.
Phase 2 — Plan (ralplan)
- Run
@ralplan. Generate plan, present for approval. - On approval:
save_planapproved=true.
Phase 3 — Execute (tdd or ralph)
- If building new functionality: use
@tdd(tests first). - If modifying existing code: use
@ralph. - Call
update_mode_stateafter each step.
Phase 4 — Verify (review + security + qa + pipeline)
@review— full code review, PASS required to continue.@security-review— zero CRITICAL required to continue.@qa --full— all checks pass.@pipeline— full CI gate.
Phase 5 — Ship (git-master)
@git-master clean-commit— conventional commit.@git-master prep-pr— full PR description.- Call
save_checkpointwith final summary.
Abort conditions
@reviewreturns FAIL → fix issues before continuing (do not skip)@security-reviewreturns CRITICAL → fix before continuing (hard stop)@pipelineFAIL after 2 cycles → surface to user, do not force-ship
Rules
- No shortcuts. Every phase runs.
- Each phase must pass before the next starts.
save_checkpointafter each phase so ultrawork is resumable.- This mode is slow by design — use it when quality matters most.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 54 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 4b69f121be7e
ultrawork is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Jkudjo/oh-my-cursor (1 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 522 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
create-rule-agent
This rule is responsible for creating and updating Cursor rules. Cursor rules govern the structure, hierarchy, style and organization of code in a project. This rule should be invoked in Agent mode when: 1. a user wants to create a new cursor rule, 2. a user wants to update or change an existing rule, 3. user wants…
changelog-generator-manual
This rule generates a comprehensive changelog.md file by analyzing all git tags and commits, creating a chronological record of all project changes with proper semantic versioning structure. The changelog.md file is stored at the root of the project.
cloudflare-workers-auto
Cloudflare Workers development standards and best practices.
vue3-typescript-auto
Vue 3 with TypeScript Standards.
release-changelog-auto
This rule generates a comprehensive changelog.md file by analyzing all git tags and commits, creating a chronological record of all project changes with proper semantic versioning structure. The changelog.md file is stored at the root of the project.
release-package-version-auto
This rule checks the current version in package.json and offers to update it to a new version. It also offers to commit the version change and push the commit. It runs when users request release creation, version bumping, or package publishing.