git-workflow

A set of Git rules for writing consistent commit messages, naming branches, and preparing pull requests (requests to merge code changes).

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when creating commits, branches, or pull requests, and when checking that tests, linting, security, and documentation are covered.
Why use it?
It gives the team a shared format and checklist, so changes are easier to understand and review.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/jy315189/everything-cursor/git-workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jy315189/everything-cursor

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 318 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 318 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00318 $0.00318
Opus 5 $0.00159 $0.00159
Sonnet 5 $0.00064 $0.00064
Haiku 4.5 $0.00032 $0.00032

Measured yesterday against content hash 3c10d768e641, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

git-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/git-workflow.mdc · 74 lines

What it actually says

Git Workflow

Conventional Commits

Format: type(scope): description

Types

  • feat: New feature
  • fix: Bug fix
  • docs: Documentation
  • style: Formatting (no code change)
  • refactor: Code restructuring
  • test: Adding tests
  • chore: Maintenance tasks

Examples

feat(auth): add OAuth2 login support
fix(cart): resolve quantity update bug
docs(api): update endpoint documentation
refactor(user): extract validation logic
test(checkout): add integration tests

Branch Naming

feature/add-user-auth
bugfix/cart-total-calculation
hotfix/security-patch
release/v1.2.0

PR Process

Before Creating PR

  • All tests pass
  • Code follows style guidelines
  • No linting errors
  • Self-reviewed changes

PR Description Template

## Summary
Brief description of changes

## Changes
- Change 1
- Change 2

## Testing
- [ ] Unit tests added
- [ ] Integration tests pass
- [ ] Manual testing completed

## Screenshots (if applicable)

Code Review Checklist

  • Logic is correct
  • Error handling present
  • No security issues
  • Tests are adequate
  • Documentation updated
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 74 lines · 318 tokens per session scan A 3c10d768e641

Subscribe to this mod's changes

git-workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository jy315189/everything-cursor (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 318 tokens to every session, about $0.0016 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.