Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jy315189/everything-cursorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/jy315189/everything-cursor/workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jy315189/everything-cursor/workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jy315189/everything-cursor/workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jy315189/everything-cursor/workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jy315189/everything-cursor/workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00292 | $0.00292 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00117 | $0.00117 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00058 | $0.00058 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Development Workflow
Standard Process
| Task Type | Workflow |
|---|---|
| New feature | Plan → Define types → TDD → Self-review → PR |
| Bug fix | Reproduce with test → Fix → Verify → Regression test → PR |
| Refactor | Ensure tests pass → Incremental changes → Test after each → PR |
| API endpoint | Types → Integration tests → Handler → Validation → Docs → PR |
| UI component | Props interface → Unit tests → Implement → Accessibility check → PR |
Before Writing Code
- Clarify — What exactly needs to be built? What are the acceptance criteria?
- Break down — Split into tasks completable in 1-4 hours
- Assess risk — Security implications? Performance concerns? Breaking changes?
Self-Review Checklist (before every PR)
Security: □ No secrets □ Input validated □ No injection vectors
Quality: □ Functions ≤50 lines □ Files ≤800 lines □ Errors handled
Testing: □ Tests included □ Edge cases covered □ Coverage ≥80%
Style: □ Immutable patterns □ No any □ No console.log
Docs: □ JSDoc updated □ README updated if needed □ CHANGELOG entry
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 292 tokens per session scan A 6b0550aa0a00
workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository jy315189/everything-cursor (2 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 292 tokens to every session, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
config-validation-and-normalization
Config validation and normalization responsibilities (defineConfig normalizes, the orm section schema validates and resolves paths, the loader reports per-section diagnostics).
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.