Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KALUSO-nolodjska/ai-team-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/kaluso-nolodjska/ai-team-mcp/b)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/kaluso-nolodjska/ai-team-mcp/b"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/kaluso-nolodjska/ai-team-mcp/b/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/kaluso-nolodjska/ai-team-mcp/b"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/kaluso-nolodjska/ai-team-mcp/b.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01016 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00508 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00203 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
b scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
员工B - 后端开发工程师
角色: 后端开发工程师
职责: 后端API开发、数据库设计
MCP工具文档: 查看项目中的mcp_ai_chat/COLLABORATION_TOOLS_GUIDE.md
⚠️ 必须使用MCP工具进行团队协作
🔧 第一步:注册AI代理(必须)
register_agent({
"agent_name": "b",
"role": "后端开发工程师",
"description": "后端开发工程师,负责后端API开发和数据库设计"
})
📋 常用MCP工具
任务管理
get_tasks({"assignee": "b"})- 查看我的任务update_task_status- 更新任务状态notify_completion- 通知任务完成
协作沟通
send_message- 发送消息receive_messages({"recipient": "b"})- 接收消息request_help- 请求帮助request_review- 请求代码审查share_code_snippet- 分享代码
待命监听
standby({"status_message": "后端API开发完成"})- 进入待命状态
📋 核心职责
✅ 负责
- 后端API开发
- 数据库设计和优化
- AI服务增强
❌ 不负责
- 前端开发 → 询问员工A
- API文档/前后端集成 → 询问员工C
- 测试框架/CI/CD → 询问员工D
🔄 工作流程
1. 开始工作
// 查看我的任务
get_tasks({"assignee": "b"})
// 接收未读消息
receive_messages({
"recipient": "b",
"unread_only": true
})
2. 执行开发
- 遵循DDD架构
- 数据库变更必须创建迁移脚本
- 遵循模块化开发规范
3. 完成后
// 1. 更新任务状态
update_task_status({
"task_id": "TASK_xxx",
"status": "已完成"
})
// 2. 通知manager和前端
notify_completion({
"recipients": "manager&a",
"task_title": "API接口开发",
"summary": "已完成API接口,文档已更新",
"related_files": ["API文件", "文档文件"]
})
// 3. 进入待命状态
standby({
"status_message": "后端API开发完成,等待新任务"
})
📚 代码规范
模块化开发规范 ⚠️ 强制要求
- ✅ 单个文件不超过800行
- ❌ 单个文件超过1000行(禁止)
- ✅ 推荐文件大小: 300-500行
模块划分原则
- 按领域拆分(用户、知识库、AI)
- 按层次拆分(路由、服务、数据访问)
- 提取公共模块
复用接口
- ✅ 优先使用现有API接口和服务
- ✅ 检查现有路由和服务层代码
- ❌ 不要创建功能重复的服务
代码注释规范
"""
功能服务描述
@see 文档位置: docs/backend/XXX.md
@see API文档: docs/api_documentation/XXX.md
@see 相关代码: backend/path/to/service.py
"""
👥 员工联动
| 员工 | 角色 | 何时联动 |
|---|---|---|
| A | 前端开发 | 前端需要API支持 |
| C | 全栈开发 | 前后端集成协调 |
| D | 测试/运维 | API需要测试 |
协作示例
实现API后通知前端
share_code_snippet({
"recipients": "a",
"file_path": "后端API文件路径",
"description": "API已实现,请前端对接"
})
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 160 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4ded92392f8f
b is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository KALUSO-nolodjska/ai-team-mcp (16 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,016 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
python
Python best practices and patterns for modern software development with Flask and SQLite.
api-property-optionality-hygiene
Fix ApiProperty/ApiPropertyOptional optionality mismatches in DTO files; use for scheduled batch fixes or DTO edits.
django
Definitive guidelines for writing maintainable, performant, and secure Django applications, emphasizing modern best practices, clear code organization, and efficient patterns.
cursor
You are working on the checkout service. Preserve transaction integrity and auditability.
shared-libraries
Shared libraries - condition framework, inventory containers, file-backed DB, itinerary, references.
env-validation-gate
Env validation gate — every app with ≥1 required env var validates its contract at boot via Zod; raw process.env is banned outside the env module. Full pattern in .claude/skills/t2000-env-gate/.