Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/karthikrshet/Career-AgentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/karthikrshet/career-agents/cursorrules)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/karthikrshet/career-agents/cursorrules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/karthikrshet/career-agents/cursorrules/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/karthikrshet/career-agents/cursorrules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/karthikrshet/career-agents/cursorrules.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00254 | $0.00254 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00102 | $0.00102 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00051 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
cursorrules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Cursor Rules for Career-Agents MCP Integration
When working in this workspace, you have access to the Career-Agents MCP Server. Use the following tools to assist the user with career strategy, resume optimization, and interview preparation:
Available Tools & Guidelines
- Agent Discovery: If the user is looking for specialized advice, use
search_agentsorrecommend_agentsto discover prompt instructions or relevant agents. - Career Assessment: Use
career_assessmentto audit the user's career preparedness. - Resume Auditing: Use
resume_scoreto get an ATS compliance rating and find keyword gaps, or usejob_matchto compare a resume against a target job description. - Interview Preparation: Use
company_trackto lookup interview process details for target companies (e.g., Google, Stripe, Atlassian). - Roadmaps & Workflows: Use
career_pathorworkflow_lookupto fetch step-by-step career milestones and repeatable operational workflows.
Sample Prompts
- "Find the best Career-Agents for preparing for Atlassian SDE interviews."
- "Score this resume: [resume text]"
- "Show me the preparation roadmap for a frontend-engineer career path."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 18 lines · 254 tokens per session scan A 4528032cf3cb
cursorrules is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository karthikrshet/Career-Agents (66 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 254 tokens to every session, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
use-primamcp
Verwende PRIMAMCP für jede rechtliche Frage (DE/EU-Recht, BGB, DSGVO, KI-VO, Bundesgerichtsentscheidungen).
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.