Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kpritam/gremlin-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/kpritam/gremlin-mcp/03-clean-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/kpritam/gremlin-mcp/03-clean-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/kpritam/gremlin-mcp/03-clean-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/kpritam/gremlin-mcp/03-clean-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/kpritam/gremlin-mcp/03-clean-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00736 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00294 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
03-clean-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Guidelines
Core Principles
- KISS: Keep code simple, avoid over-engineering
- YAGNI: Don’t add features until they are needed
- DRY: Eliminate duplication via abstraction or reuse
- Small Functions: Each function should do one thing well
- No Side Effects: Prefer pure functions; isolate effects at the edges
Naming & Structure
- Use meaningful, self-explanatory names
- Group related code logically; use barrel exports for modules
- Keep types/interfaces close to where they’re used; extract only when shared
- Constants should replace all magic numbers and strings
Comments & Documentation
- Document public APIs and complex logic only
- Use comments to explain why, not what
- For tricky/effects-heavy code, describe gotchas and assumptions
- Use TypeDoc (
/** ... */) format
TypeScript Practices
- Enable strict mode in
tsconfig.json - Avoid
any; preferunknownwith type guards - Use
interfacefor objects,typefor unions/intersections - Always type public function signatures explicitly
- Prefer readonly types for immutability
- Use discriminated unions for safer branching
- Avoid type assertions except at clear boundaries (e.g., parsing JSON)
Error Handling
- Never throw — instead:
- Use
Either/Option/Resulttypes from effect libraries - Represent expected failures in the type system
- Use
- Always handle errors at the boundary of the system (e.g., API layer)
- Include contextual information in error values (not stack traces)
Effect-TS / Functional Code
- Model side effects with typed effects, not untyped Promises
- Prefer composition over nesting (
pipe,flatMap,mapError) - Use
Layerfor dependency injection - Always annotate effect return types for clarity
- Avoid calling
unsafeRun*in core logic; restrict it to the application entrypoint
Testing
- Write tests for public APIs and critical logic
- Include edge cases, failure cases, and effectful code
- Keep test code clean and readable; use descriptive test names
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 736 tokens per session scan A 1c7b23f1dacc
03-clean-code is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository kpritam/gremlin-mcp (9 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 736 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
clean-code-reviewer
Eliminates technical debt using SOLID, DRY, YAGNI, and Addy Osmani production-grade engineering principles. / TR: SOLID, DRY, YAGNI ve Addy Osmani üretim seviyesi mühendislik ilkeleri ile kod kalitesini denetleyen yetenek.
sweep-benchmarks
Audit xrspatial modules for asv benchmark coverage gaps: missing benchmarks, backend parameterization gaps, unrepresentative inputs, broken or silently-skipped benchmarks.
code-review
BMAD BMM Agent: code-review.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.