Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kubev2v/forklift-console-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/debugging)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/debugging/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/debugging.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00004 | $0.00994 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00398 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Debugging Workflow
Invoke with: "help debug", "troubleshoot", "why isn't this working", "fix this error"
1. Understand the Problem
Gather Information
- What is the expected behavior?
- What is the actual behavior?
- When did it start happening?
- Is it reproducible? What are the exact steps?
- Any error messages in the console or network tab?
Classify the Issue
- Render issue: Component not displaying correctly
- State issue: Data not updating or stale
- API issue: Network request failing or returning wrong data
- Type issue: TypeScript compilation error
- Style issue: Layout or visual problem
- Performance issue: Slow rendering or memory leak
2. Isolate the Problem
Check the Error Message
- Read the full stack trace
- Identify the file and line number
- Understand what the error means
Narrow Down the Scope
- Which component is affected?
- Is it a rendering problem or a data problem?
- Does it happen with specific data or always?
- Does it happen in a specific provider type?
Reproduce Minimally
- Find the simplest case that triggers the issue
- Remove unrelated code/props to isolate
3. Common Issue Categories
Component Not Rendering
- Check if data is loaded (
loadedflag) - Check for errors (
loadError) - Check conditional rendering logic
- Verify props are being passed correctly
- Check for early returns hiding content
State Not Updating
- Check
useStatesetter is being called - Check
useEffectdependencies - Look for stale closures
- Verify state is at the right component level
- Check if re-render is being suppressed by memoization
API/Resource Issues
- Check
useK8sWatchResourceconfiguration (GVK, namespace) - Verify the resource exists:
oc get <resource> -n <namespace> - Check RBAC permissions:
oc auth can-i list <resource> - Look at network tab for failed requests
- Check if provider is in Ready state
TypeScript Errors
- Read the error message carefully
- Check type definitions in
@forklift-ui/types - Verify optional chaining for nullable fields
- Check import paths and aliases
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 150 lines · 4 tokens per session scan A 1989dc1706a4
debugging is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 4 tokens to every session and 994 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
error-handling-and-validation
A code-quality guide for handling errors, invalid inputs, edge cases, preconditions, logging, and user-friendly error messages.
css-render-blocking-diagnosis
Cursor rule "css-render-blocking-diagnosis" from adobecom/da-express-milo, covering css render-blocking diagnosis & resolution, critical learning from 98 pagespeed achievement, primary diagnostic protocol, step 1: css blocking symptom recognition and step 2: css loading sequence audit.
modus-checkbox-value-inversion-react-short
Critical bug fix for ModusWcCheckbox value property inversion.
javascript-expert-performance
Profile first. Measure before and after. Never optimize without data.
kiss-ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
5-bug-finder
APPLY WHEN investigating a bug.