playwright-testing

A workflow for browser-based end-to-end tests, which check complete user actions in a running interface. It covers upstream tests with mocked services and downstream tests with real provider connections.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to test the interface in a browser, write end-to-end tests, or check UI flows with mocked data or real providers.
Why use it?
It explains which test tier to use and how to run it, including when credentials and real infrastructure are required.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/playwright-testing
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 10 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,155 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00010 $0.02155
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.01077
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00431
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00215

Measured 2d ago against content hash db9b18edd857, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

playwright-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/workflows/playwright-testing.mdc · 269 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 269 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Playwright Testing Workflow

Invoke with: "test the UI", "write an e2e test", "test in browser", "upstream test", "downstream test"


1. Upstream vs Downstream

This project has two tiers of E2E tests, both in this repo:

Upstream Downstream
Location testing/playwright/e2e/upstream/ testing/playwright/e2e/downstream/
Tag @upstream @downstream
Providers Mocked via API intercepts Real providers (vSphere, oVirt, OpenStack, OVA)
Credentials Not required Requires testing/.providers.json (not in repo)
Data Static fixtures (fixtures/test-data.ts) Dynamic data from real provider inventory
Purpose UI logic, rendering, form flows Full integration -- closest to production
Run npm run test:upstream (in testing/) npm run test:downstream (in testing/)

Downstream tests are the priority -- they exercise real provider connections, actual migrations, and the full UI flow against a real cluster. Upstream tests are useful for fast feedback on UI-only changes.

Upstream is effectively a subset of downstream: upstream covers basic happy paths with mocked data, while downstream covers the same flows plus provider-specific behavior with real infrastructure.


2. Test Directory Structure

For a fuller “how to read this suite” guide (fixtures, intercepts, utils, lint layers), see testing/README.md.

testing/
  playwright/
    e2e/
      upstream/              # Mocked tests (2 files)
      downstream/            # Real provider tests (17+ files)
        providers/
        plans/
        network-maps/
        storage-maps/
    fixtures/                # Test fixtures and helpers
    intercepts/              # API mocking for upstream tests
    page-objects/            # Page Object Model classes
    utils/                   # Utility functions (provider config, helpers)
    types/                   # TypeScript types
    global.setup.ts          # Authentication setup
    global.teardown.ts       # Resource cleanup
  .providers.json.template   # Provider credential template
  e2e.env.template           # Environment variable template
  run-tests.sh               # Containerized test runner (CI/Jenkins)

Read the full file on GitHub · 269 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 269 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A db9b18edd857

Subscribe to this mod's changes

playwright-testing is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin (11 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 2,155 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.