Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/pr-preparationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kubev2v/forklift-console-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/pr-preparation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/pr-preparation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/pr-preparation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00949 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00475 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
pr-preparation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 185 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Preparation Workflow
Invoke with: "prepare PR", "ready for review", "PR checklist", "before I submit"
Follow this comprehensive workflow before creating a pull request.
1. Code Completion Check
- All acceptance criteria met
- Edge cases handled
- Loading/error/empty states implemented
- No TODO comments without linked issues
- No commented-out code
- No console.log statements
- No hardcoded test data
2. Code Quality Checks
Run All Checks
npm run lint && npm test
TypeScript
- No type errors
- No implicit
anytypes - Explicit return types on functions
Linting
- ESLint passes without errors
- Prettier formatting applied
Unit Tests
- All existing tests pass
- New tests added for new code
- Edge cases tested
3. i18n Verification
npm run i18n
- All user-facing strings use
t()function - Translation file changes committed
- Proper interpolation for dynamic values
4. Self Code Review
Developer Perspective
- Single responsibility followed
- Files under 300 lines
- No code duplication
- No magic numbers
- Clean imports (no unused, no barrel files)
- Error handling for all async operations
UX Perspective
- Loading states visible
- Error states informative
- Empty states guide users
- Keyboard navigation works
- PatternFly components used correctly
QE Perspective
- Empty/null data handled
- Boundary values considered
- Double-click prevention where needed
- Test coverage adequate
Security Perspective
- User input validated
- No XSS vulnerabilities
- No sensitive data exposed
- Permissions checked
5. Visual Verification
- Feature works as expected
- UI looks correct
- Screenshots/video for UI changes (before/after if relevant)
6. Commit Hygiene
Commit Format
All commits must include a Resolves: line and be signed off (-s flag) for DCO compliance:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 185 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A e3bdac94bfda
pr-preparation is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin (11 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 949 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.
family-instance-domain-actions
Family instance domain action implementation patterns.