self-learning

A rule for saving reliable solutions from past coding tasks as reusable Cursor rules. Cursor rules are project instructions that can be loaded in later coding sessions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to record commands, file locations, credentials or environment details, deployment steps, database workflows, and other repeatable project procedures.
Why use it?
It prevents recurring work from starting with the same discovery, failed attempts, or explanations.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/kulaxyz/self-learning-skills/self-learning
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kulaxyz/self-learning-skills

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 637 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 637 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00637 $0.00637
Opus 5 $0.00318 $0.00318
Sonnet 5 $0.00127 $0.00127
Haiku 4.5 $0.00064 $0.00064

Measured yesterday against content hash b344f5d4c62f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

self-learning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/self-learning.mdc · 68 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Self-learning

Make yourself self-improving: when you earn a reusable golden path, capture it so the next session starts knowing it instead of rediscovering it.

Recognize the moment

  • A task only worked after several attempts, wrong turns, or a correction.
  • You found project facts you didn't know up front: where creds/env vars live, a non-obvious command, a required sequence, a gotcha that defies the obvious.
  • An operational workflow likely to recur — reach the dev/prod DB, deploy, run migrations, seed data, verify a change live.
  • The user says "remember this" / "don't make me re-explain this next time".

Act on the cue immediately — don't ask permission first. Then tell the user what you saved and where.

Capture it as a rule

Write a new rule at .cursor/rules/learned/<short-name>.mdc:

---
description: <what it does AND when to use it — this is how Cursor reloads it later>
# or, if path-specific instead of description-triggered:
# globs: ["path/glob/**"]
---

# <title>

**Goal:** <the recurring task this serves>

## Steps
1. <exact command / path; keep the required order if it matters>

## Gotchas
- <non-obvious fact; where a secret lives — never the value>

## What didn't work
- <approach you ruled out, and why>

Capture the procedure (commands, paths, order, gotchas), not a one-off answer, plus the failures so next time skips the dead-ends.

Promotion rule

Only write a rule when all three hold, so guesses don't get enshrined:

  1. A passing check — the path was actually verified (test passed, clean exit, green build, reproduced repro). "Seemed to work" doesn't count.
  2. A named failure pattern — you can name the failure it avoids or diagnoses.
  3. At least one ruled-out dead-end — an approach you tried and eliminated.

If any is missing, leave a tentative note in project memory instead, or skip it.

Rules

  • Never write secret values (tokens, passwords, connection strings, keys). Record only where they live (env var name, config file, secret manager).
  • A one-line fact → put it in project notes/memory, not a whole rule.
  • A genuine one-off → skip it.

Read the full file on GitHub · 68 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 68 lines · 637 tokens per session scan A b344f5d4c62f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

self-learning is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Kulaxyz/self-learning-skills (937 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 637 tokens to every session, about $0.0032 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.